Latest News

FIT: Waxing, Waning, and the Revelation of St. Hildegard

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

Changed theory on how the Moon might function as some kind of capacitor, based on the discovery of St. Hildegard and encounter with Moonlight temperature level experiments.

Clipped Quote from St. Hildegard's Revelation:
" As long as the moon waxes lit by the sunlight, it receives fire from the celebrities as well as from the sun … as well as while it subsides it instills its fire into the stars, yet not into the sunlight; for that stands apart as it resembled a princess, and it is constantly in just one state." "Yet if the moon is completely full …, after that it releases its light and transfers it to the stars, and thus the stars end up being brighter."

22 Comments on FIT: Waxing, Waning, and the Revelation of St. Hildegard

  1. Jonathan Lawrence // 18th September 2016 at 6:22 pm // Reply

    Woah. I’ve been following most of the things you say for months. This is
    way out there.

  2. Richard clarke // 18th September 2016 at 6:24 pm // Reply

    Good to see you Brian! Hope you and your new bride are happy and filled
    with our Lord Jesus Christ! Be blessed!

  3. FlatEarth Photography // 18th September 2016 at 6:35 pm // Reply

    I wonder if you came to realise that we have numerous suns that differ in
    speeds even in the same country?

  4. This is a interesting theory. I have been tracking the stars for last few
    months. And it is perplexing why the intensity of the stars seems to
    change. I blamed it on light polution and atmospheric conditions. Btw who
    the heck is St. Hildegard and when did she receive this revelation?

  5. Taboo Conspiracy // 18th September 2016 at 6:58 pm // Reply

    Fascinating! I have an infrared thermometer as well. I’ll try to test this.

  6. If this is possible and the moon is effecting the stars …..then the stars
    are closer than we are told….just a thought.

  7. I was hoping to see a new vid from Brian soon… going into the waning
    phase now…

  8. Anibal Morales // 18th September 2016 at 7:43 pm // Reply

    Dollard proposed that the Sun is in fact a CONVERTER of energy. Nobody
    knows where this energy comes from but it is not a flaming ball of fire or
    nuclear in nature.

    • Interesting. Regardless of what it is we are still only observers. I think
      there truth revealed in the bible we just gloss over. Psalm 19 – ..”sun.
      Which is a bridegroom coming out if his chamber..” If you think about a
      chamber of a gun, it’s a cylindrical shape. The perfect circle shape of the
      sun suggests to me we are looking into the chamber of sun. Certainly not
      into exploding gases.

    • comes from the octahedron

  9. Peaches & Speeches // 18th September 2016 at 8:14 pm // Reply

    This makes me so so so happy! Thanks for inspiring me to get back into my
    research!

  10. Fantastic! Congratulations on your marriage. Thank you for sharing your
    discoveries.

  11. Could there be a magnetic connection, to the sun, near the North Pole?
    Think wireless charging. Why has the sun been effected so greatly whenever
    CERN cranks up the collider?

  12. http://spaceweathernews.com it’s worth watching the daily videos this
    website puts out. Lots of info around solar activity, and it’s effects.

  13. If you want to know where the sun gets it power from look at Cell Earth
    Reality.

  14. David Murphy (DaddyMonster) // 18th September 2016 at 10:42 pm // Reply

    “Revelation”, noun, to pull something out of your backside. In your defence
    at least you’re trying to test it, you’re not pretending you have empirical
    evidence to back any of this up and you accept that your previous model
    doesn’t work. Just I have to ask, what possible mechanism would make you
    suspect that that the energy received and exerted by the moon would be
    different in different phases? What shape are you saying the moon is? If a
    sphere then why are you looking for a bizarre and complicated explanation
    into something so obvious and straightforward? Why would objects all share
    energy with the exception of the moon to the sun? What kind of a model of
    Thermal Dynamics are you proposing that doesn’t work the same in all cases?
    Is there any reason to even suspect any of this?

    You seem to have some kind of Lavoisier type calorific model of energy
    transfer but Count Rumford and then Joule put that to bed two hundred years
    ago. Listen to yourself, are you really going to argue that Joule was wrong
    based on some revelation?? I mean, your computer works doesn’t it?!

  15. Very interesting ideas.

  16. does the electromagnetics come in to effect at Anny time ,or what roll
    would electromagnetics play in this theory,love your videos,and so happy
    you found a soul mate , peace

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


Shares
Share This