Latest News

Damaged Thinking – Is It Fluoride? (Flat Earth)

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

Friction and also a flat planet VS a spinning sphere. Who are the real dummies? If its me, you must have the ability to reveal me the evidence with Newtonian physics. THINK PEOPLE! Get the Fluoride or whatever the issue runs out your machine. There is no other way the air, water, and land can ALL rotate at the same price. IMPOSSIBLE making use of physics. It is just possible in damaged minds. Unless you can verify otherwise – but you can not!

" Fluoride Tune NeuroToxin in Mental retardation in assuming capacity"

I am almost embarrassed that I have to make a video clip similar to this to discuss to individuals with a brain that it is difficult for the air, water as well as land all to be relocating lockstep with each other on a rotating round. It is proof that individuals will certainly think ANYTHING – reasoning be damned.

48 Comments on Damaged Thinking – Is It Fluoride? (Flat Earth)

  1. MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:13 pm // Reply

    I am almost embarrassed that I have to make a video like this to explain to
    people with a brain that it is impossible for the air, water and land all
    to be moving in lockstep together on a spinning ball. It is proof that
    people will believe ANYTHING – logic be damned.

    • just like you said but look how they are defending globe with no proofs

    • just like you said but look how they are defending globe with no proofs

    • +Jeremy Schoonover
      Space, but even there it’s not a perfect vacuum, you know that right?

    • +EDIcoN
      I’ll go on and post it finally.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

      One of the reasons children should be taught logic and philosophy in school
      as mandatory subjects. Something that they actually had in the Imperial
      Russian period until Lenin removed it.

      Basically, all that describes a planet, a system, a galaxy, a universe, is
      never complete, because some things cannot be proven or disproven using
      resources from that same little system.

      Same as even if we find out everything about our Universe we won’t know
      “where it is, what’s it contained in, etc” (just a stupid simple little
      example).

      Transporting that onto MrThrive, our friend needs actual knowledge to get
      out the very small bubble that he’s stuck in, unfortunately, to formulate
      questions that actually DO challenge the Globe.

    • +Mike K?
      im wondering what you are a robot or a human.

  2. Timon Rivera // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:15 pm // Reply

    videos not playing

  3. The assertion that the controlled quantities of Fluoride in drinking water
    has a deleterious effect on human health is unfounded. The concentration is
    infinitesimal – bear in mind the fundamental Hippocratic tenet ‘The dose
    alone makes the poison’ – particularly pertinent in this case.

    • MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:56 pm // Reply

      And if you drink it over and over and get direct applications at the
      dentist and in toothpaste every day! I just knew someone would lath onto
      “Fluoride is okay – nothing to see there!” – That’s fine – enjoy it – you
      can have my share. There is a reason it is classified as a POISON!

    • +MrThriveAndSurvive – I’ll send them mine too. Happily.

    • Jeremy Schoonover // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:14 pm // Reply

      Numerous studies have concluded that not only is Fluoride detrimental to
      health but lowers IQ points as well. Look for the article in The Lancet and
      the Chinese study stating just as much. I’d link but I think you’re lucky
      enough I even responded to your nonsense comment.

    • +Jeremy Schoonover – Thankyou Jeremy. Problem is, the Ziontists won’t
      accept any other cultures research. Havnt you noticed they also support
      genocide and murder publicly. What’s a little poison to the Goyim, a little
      slow thinking… they are nasty evil entities.

    • Jeremy Schoonover // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:23 pm // Reply

      No problem. I like to give respect where respect is due. Intelligence
      isn’t inherited it’s grown and nurtured. These ignorant people should pay
      more attention and learn from MrThriveAndSurvive’s insightful videos
      instead of throwing half a brain cell’s worth of criticism at it.

  4. Good stuff,man

  5. John Galt // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:41 pm // Reply

    GMO’s, Fluroride, Vaccines, Geoengineering, Fukushima, Planet X,
    Frankenscience
    Frankfurt School of Marxism – Fabian Socialism

  6. Bill Duke // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:42 pm // Reply

    I use an iron frying pan for much of my cooking…frying eggs included. If
    that pan is seasoned and oiled correctly you can flip eggs just about as
    good as in Teflon (which I would not use on a bet). May seem trivial, but
    little things like this can turn a listening audience off.

    • Bill Duke // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:44 pm // Reply

      No, I am not a troll or a shill and am actually a flat earther who is still
      waiting for a response to my comment on your previous video re the baseball.

    • MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:00 pm // Reply

      OMG – I am NOT advocating Teflon use. Geeze! I am pointing out differences
      in friction.

    • MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:01 pm // Reply

      Tell me here – there are way too many to seek through there. Thanks.

    • Rich, never said you did…I’m just using it as an example.

    • Generally, I don’t step into these
      discussion but this one caught my interest. The is flawed by a
      misunderstanding of reference frames. To determine the lateral
      displacement due to a spinning reference frame for an object moving
      perpendicular to the spin (another description of what is going on in
      the video), you need to evaluate not the spinning motion at one point
      (where the ball is hit by the batter) but rather the difference in spin
      form the point the ball is hit minus the spin from where the ball lands.
      That is what determine the apparent lateral shift due to spin.

      You
      can test this yourself with a linear motion reference frame such as a
      car driving down the road. Throw a tennis ball out the window while
      you’re doing say 20mph. Have a person standing on the side of the road
      film the ball. A person in the car should throw the ball from the
      window exactly as he passes the person filming. Now I ask you to
      notice, where does the ball land? it was thrown perpendicular from the
      car’s motion directly at the person filming. But does the ball travel
      directly toward the camera? Does the ball travel in an angel away from
      the car and in the direction of motion of the car? What does the person
      throwing the ball see happen (have him film it too). Does he see the
      ball go straight away from the car in a perpendicular motion? or does
      the ball go straight toward the person filming from the side of the
      road?

      This little experiment will show you how reference frames
      appear to the viewer. The person in the car sees one view but the
      person standing “still” sees another view of the event. Yet the ball
      must do the same thing in both instances as the throw is a singular
      event observed from two distinct reference frames.

      My point to
      this exercise is that in the video the narrator assumes a vantage point
      that is standing still from the side of the road. Yet if the earth is
      spinning all observers on the earth will be in the car reference frame
      which is moving. You can not see what the still observer will witness
      when you are in the moving reference frame. This is the fallacy of his
      argument. Yes the earth is spinning in places faster than the speed of
      sound (if the globe model is correct). Yet everything on the earth
      would be spinning at the same rate. The speed of sound sonic boom
      argument has to occur in a separate reference frame. I could just as
      easily say that we are moving away from any star at a bajillion MPH
      which could be true but it doesn’t mean that there would be any sonic
      boom on earth relative to that star; only observers on the star would
      notice a boom if there were a medium to transmit the compressive sound
      wave from the earth to that star.

  7. Richard Lee Burke Jr. // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:45 pm // Reply

    always good to hear you explain things keep up the great work you do

  8. John Pliskin // 3rd Sep 2016 at 8:55 pm // Reply

    some of us have known of this for a while sir. with all due respect.you are
    the latecomer we are living in a matrix .love your work.

    • MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:58 pm // Reply

      Probably because Meteorology was my first love from age 4-5 I knew this
      always. You can’t study the atmosphere and “know” it is all connected
      together and moving as “one”.

  9. Ray Whitson // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:05 pm // Reply

    I can’t understand with so much information available too you still fail to
    understand the basics of the Globe model. If just once you could
    accurately describe the model you are trying to disprove people may
    actually pay attention to the FE movement BUT if you keep on putting out
    this type of ignorance you basically have no hope. Literally every point
    you made I can easily prove wrong.

    • TinfoilHatGirl // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:16 pm // Reply

      Well go on, give it a start. Let’s see ….oh surprise surprise…again a
      troll with a NO CONTENT channel.

    • Ray Whitson // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:25 pm // Reply

      +TinfoilHatGirl Oh I can’t explain the whole thing, I don’t have that kind
      of time… pick one of the point and I will explain why its wrong.

    • +TinfoilHatGirl
      We’re not all masterminds, stirring up demagoguery around “presumably”
      controversial stuff, trying to get monetized, you see. We’re just users,
      and here not to troll, but to (get entertained) and to ensure that our and
      other people’s kids don’t have to grow up in such a polluted youtube. How
      is THIS different from the fakeass manipulating mass media, same sht really.

  10. John Pliskin // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:05 pm // Reply

    you are not dumb you are dead to rights the math does support your theory.
    if they dont like it they can lump it .dont drink from the tap .love all

  11. Angela Qaiser NAZIR // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:06 pm // Reply

    Good video, did you ever figure out why the distance aspirated the same on
    Google Earth for Antarctica…i think it’s key for the true shape of earth.
    Peace

  12. The Voice of God // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:13 pm // Reply

    I’m embarrassed for you as well. Another video full of assumptions and
    totally lacking in any calculations. You can’t disprove the globe model if
    you fail to understand it or test it using itself even.

    No, you’re not dumb. That much is clear enough with every video you make.

    You still insist the earth is rotating quickly, it’s spinning at 0.0007
    rpm, do you really think that’s quick?

    You keep insisting on saying 1000mph, it’s clear you have not studied
    inertial frames of reference, if you had done you’d know that it’s
    meaningless to the system in question.

    The force from the spin of the earth is a tiny fraction of that provided by
    gravity.

    1000 mph sounds fast to you and so you assume too many things that you
    haven’t actually checked with any research, you are a poor researcher.

    But you ain’t dumb that’s for sure.

    • Jeremy Schoonover // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:27 pm // Reply

      What you, and everyone else, fails to latch on to is that there is no 100%
      efficient transfer of motion between the rotations of earth air and water.
      And if you plan on arguing with me, show me the perpetual motion machine
      you’re trying to create please.

    • Allison Rose // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:33 pm // Reply

      But you are dumb… very dumb.

    • MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:55 pm // Reply

      AMEN!

    • I’ll go on and post it finally.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

      One of the reasons children should be taught logic and philosophy in school
      as mandatory subjects. Something that they actually had in the Imperial
      Russian period until Lenin removed it.

      Basically, all that describes a planet, a system, a galaxy, a universe, is
      never complete, because some things cannot be proven or disproven using
      resources from that same little system.

      Same as even if we find out everything about our Universe we won’t know
      “where it is, what’s it contained in, etc” (just a stupid simple little
      example).

      Transporting that onto MrThrive, our friend needs actual knowledge to get
      out the very small bubble that he’s stuck in, unfortunately, to formulate
      questions that actually DO challenge the Globe.

  13. Flouride? Nah.. probably colloidal silver.

    • MrThriveAndSurvive // 3rd Sep 2016 at 9:59 pm // Reply

      Could be, you can have what is declared a poison. I’ll take what has saved
      my life.

  14. All other variables remaining constant, I would suggest that anybody who
    has purged Fluoride from their drinking water and subsequently reached the
    erroneous conclusion that the Earth is a flat plane might want to consider
    putting it back in.

  15. Christer Toll // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:04 pm // Reply

    So. The reason water sticks to land is becaue of friction. It’s that
    simple, really. Yes, both have different coefficiencies, but that doesn’t
    actually matter in this case. Friction is, for all intents and purposes,
    something that keeps things together.

    Still, though, we don’t even need friction for it, and it will even explain
    how the air is moving along at the same speed: Resistance. If we completely
    ignore friction, the water would still travel at the same speed of the
    earth, since it’d be pushed along due to it, by necessity, having earth
    barriers. For instance, fill a container with water. Push it along. Will
    the water start moving at the same speeed as the container? Yes, it will.
    It will slosh for a while to start before the water has gotten up to speed,
    but before too long it’ll just keep moving along with the container, and an
    observer inside that container wouldn’t even know the container is moving
    based on how the water behaves.

    This also ties into the air. You said it yourself; while there is no
    friction against the air, there sill still be air resistance. This
    resistance will attempt to move the air in the same direction as the object
    it resists. Will it happen immediately? No, of course not. But over the
    course of thousands and thousands of years, the mountains, forests, even
    the blades of grass has made the air around us move at the same speed as
    the earth below us. Do mountains reach all the way to space? No, of course
    not. However, the turbulence in the air will slowly make the whole
    atmosphere moving at roughly the same speed.

    Which, really, brings us to air vs. space. This is just pure speculation on
    my part, since I haven’t really studied it in-depth, but my thought here is
    that since the air has nothing to slow it up there, it will just keep
    moving. No friction and no resistance means there’s nothing Newton’s third
    law applies to; the object in motion will remain in motion, since there’s
    no opposite force to it.

  16. Mus Mustafa // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:07 pm // Reply

    Great video.. absolutely true. You can see this just through common sense..
    and if anyone even needs maths for this then they must be lacking in some
    common sense therefore will not understand.

  17. John Pliskin // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:14 pm // Reply

    you are brilliant.. keep it up we can always learn .we will chat again sir.

  18. Actually we are not spinning that fast. 360 degrees in 24 hours. That would
    be about 0.00416 degrees per second.

  19. Andy Niblett // 3rd Sep 2016 at 10:37 pm // Reply

    People need to stop saying friction is what’s keeping everything together
    because that’s just BS. If at each boundary between objects be it water on
    water or water on air or land on water, etc. If everything is moving at the
    same velocity, (stationary to each other relatively) then the friction is
    zero.

  20. Heavy left-brain indoctrination, fluoride, lack of cerebral balance, gmo’s,
    teflon, TV hypnosis, concentric-circular spinning sigils everywhere you
    look (I don’t), willful ignorance, denial fear, vaccines, glysophate,
    prescription drugs, lack of marijuana intake, clean water, whole foods, the
    dropping of beliefs & raising of conscious awareness etc, etc probably has
    something to do with the present state of much of humanities level of
    cognition.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


Shares
Share This