Latest News

Debunking Gravity using a fly, helicopter, smoke, Airy. Devastating Footage.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

Gravity unmasked once again. Best to date. Atheists don't exist in the scientific research globe. They are now picking side. God or Son of the Morning (Lucifer/Satan).

58 Comments on Debunking Gravity using a fly, helicopter, smoke, Airy. Devastating Footage.

  1. UniversalExpanse // 17th May 2016 at 10:04 pm // Reply

    If the earth is spherical and spinning and gravity is dragging the whole
    atmosphere around, what happens at the poles? gigantic tornadoes and
    hurricanes?…….maybe the excuse is it the eye of the storm.

    • UniversalExpanse // 3rd Jun 2016 at 12:59 am // Reply

      you cant prove anything so im all happy i have made you angry 🙂 haha !

    • Sam420Son // 3rd Jun 2016 at 3:00 am // Reply

      +gdub454 Once again you don’t know your own model. I’m sure you know all
      about fingers in buttholes though. If gravity is not dragging the
      atmosphere along with it then how do you explain flight times being the
      same going east to west or vice versa? You can’t…. and that is where the
      whole ” atmosphere being dragged along with the spinning Earth” explanation
      comes from. Not from flat Earthers but from the very mainstream that you
      worship. Just letting you know this for future references so you don’t
      continue to make yourself look like a jackass.

  2. Anthony “BigTOOT” W // 18th May 2016 at 8:53 pm // Reply

    Let me state in not all caps, because I am not yelling and I want to
    apologize for my yelling in my previous comment. Wheres the proof you have
    to go with this video? Do you know that this video is an alternate
    representation to a thesis paper to prove or disprove something? What sort
    of things do you need in a thesis paper? For starters you need at least two
    sources to draw a theory from and build on your own understanding, then you
    need to read and dissect the sources and rewrite them in your own words to
    try and get your point across, and lastly which is not last but the last of
    just writing the paper you need to cite your sources throughout your paper
    to reference back to the sources you drew your conclusions from! This video
    has none of that, it is nothing but a pathetic attempt to sway people away
    from the truth we all know and learn in this life because the the truth is
    far too scary for the majority of people to accept! If you cannot accept
    the truth of this life and cannot understand the scientific method of
    learning all you can then stop posting these videos, all this does is fill
    people with empty heads with useless dribble masquerading as intelligence!

    Also, do you know what ‘Geosynchronous” is? Look it up and that is why we
    do not fly around the earth super fast when we lift off the ground in
    anything. We and all out buildings synced with the planet…so do your
    homework first you moron!!

    • why does every satalite and shuttle ever launched always start to arc
      horizontally more and more as it gains altitude instead of taking the
      shortest distance and go strait up? i can see why they would do that if
      they wanted to orbit the earth, but that raises the question regarding
      geosynchronous vehicles. why wouldn’t a geosynchronous vehicle launch
      strait vertical if it is staying synced to the earth?

    • Marc Jacquier // 20th Jun 2016 at 12:18 pm // Reply

      +bob3484 geosynchronous satellites have to reach a circular 36000 km orbit.
      for that, they need a lot of speed and don’t forget that every gram of
      ergol at the end needs a lot more grams to propulse it at the take off
      when you drive a mountain road you don’t go straight up….
      orbital mechanics is somewhat counterintuitive

    • thx

  3. henry pendle // 19th May 2016 at 9:22 pm // Reply

    Link of that Guy from 2minutes. i want to see the full vid after his

  4. M Spinelli // 20th May 2016 at 3:28 pm // Reply

    smoke is a gas has no mass nothing to hold it

    • Roy Winkler // 20th May 2016 at 6:49 pm // Reply

      +M Spinelli … well smoke is actually an airborne particulate.

    • tell that to the scientists claiming gravity is what keeps our atmosphere
      from being sucked into the void of space

    • TourOfTorun // 21st May 2016 at 9:44 am // Reply

      +Sam420Son So the smoke is sucked into the void of space then is it? Or is
      it just floating in the atmosphere?

  5. braddream7777 // 21st May 2016 at 9:29 pm // Reply

    im a flat earth freethinker still here :)

    • +Richard Hince maybe you should just stick to one argument at a time. I
      never said anything about the color of the images. The size of the
      continents not being the same size from image to the next should make
      people wonder though. You ask me if I even question anything? The reason
      I’m here is because I question our reality.

    • You tell him buddy. The Force is real, I saw it in a movie which proved it.

    • +C Hillman Indeed, I saw that very same film, and now I know it’s real. May
      the Force be with you!

    • carpejkdiem // 9th Jul 2016 at 12:32 pm // Reply

      Mindslave puppet for your father the devil/Puppet master. Sadly

  6. Stan DaMan // 22nd May 2016 at 12:48 pm // Reply

    Atmosphere is dragged along with its rotation of earth magically. OK.
    Globeheads, do you realize that u r in religion too? U r askin urself what
    i am talkin about? OK. Ur belief system of the beast is based upon a belief
    that we live on spinning ball hovering tremendous speed in infinite space.
    You might believe that we as humans r not alone in the UNIverse (uni means
    one). There r other spieces may be more developed than us. Let me tell u
    something. Yes there r other spieces, but not from distant solar system,
    but they r hidden behind the vail and they will return as Bible says. Do
    NOT trust government, do not trust any man, trust only Jesus. And the who
    will claim to be Jesus or Messiah is anticrist, he lies to u, he hates u. U
    cannot serve two masters. Whether u r with God or against him.
    16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that
    whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
    Guys, u r already immortal. Pick wisely

  7. outsider344 // 22nd May 2016 at 9:50 pm // Reply

    If gravity doesn’t exist and only weight does then heavier objects should
    fall faster than lighter ones. But in real life a brick will fall at the
    same speed as 2 bricks taped together. How can you explain that objects
    with different weights fall at the same speed without a force that pulls on
    everything equally.

  8. demar Isaacs // 23rd May 2016 at 1:06 am // Reply

    the earth is flat and I’m not afraid to say it out LOUD

  9. Eduard Istrate // 28th May 2016 at 8:46 pm // Reply

    It’s like it’s 1134! But with the internet!

    • Randall Hanks // 22nd Jun 2016 at 8:44 pm // Reply

      Since it seems complicated for some to look up, let alone comprehend
      multiple meanings of words…..Let me enlighten you to the definitions of
      PHILOSOPHY by Mariam-Webster
      : the study of ideas about knowledge, truth, the nature and meaning of
      life, etc.
      : a particular set of ideas about knowledge, truth, the nature and meaning
      of life, etc.
      : a set of ideas about how to do something or how to live.

      The origins and creation of architecture, the THEORY of physics,
      metaphysics, religion, flat earth, round earth, and anything else anyone
      believes or studies….All different philosophies… Open your minds past
      your televisions please. Oh and science IS philosophy…..How else could
      something be put into words or drawings let alone built if it wasn’t
      thought out, studied or believed to be possible.

    • Robert L. (Kali) // 22nd Jun 2016 at 8:59 pm // Reply

      Randall Hanks

      Read carefully your definitions : They all say ” about” …
      You can talk ABOUT anything you wish without KNOWING anything ABOUT its
      true nature.
      Science is not a philosophy. Science is built on facts and observasions
      that can be comfirmed or replicated by others with well know methodology.
      A philosopher , unless he has himself a scientific education, can not teach
      science at Harvard, right ?

    • Randall Hanks // 22nd Jun 2016 at 10:22 pm // Reply

      +Robert L. ROFL putting more theory out there…. No you do not need a
      “Science” degree to teach a science class at Harvard( I could be a language
      arts major with a minor in Theology)… And please find the direct quote
      from whatever handbook you decided scroll through and don’t forget to site
      the reference…you know, for scientific purposes… Also it is not MY
      definition as sited… Maybe you need to read a bit more careful as you are
      telling me to do. More to the fact is that there are 3…..Let me say it
      again.. 3 variants to the word philosophy.. First off we are arguing a
      video that was based in theological theory of a man written book produced
      before the current age of “known” mathematics. Secondly SCIENCE in all it’s
      forms starts, continues, and conceives from a philosophy… This entire
      video is a philosophy that many chose to follow or debate. Again lets go
      back to the real issue… WAKE UP SHEEPLE, there is more than one
      definition to EVERY word in the dictionary, and depending on its context,
      is that which defines it. ever heard of creative writing, or maybe you take
      the bible at face value…Or even the government…….One thing is
      certain, someone is trying to deceive many people to believe in their
      philosophy, one way or another.

    • Robert L. (Kali) // 23rd Jun 2016 at 4:16 am // Reply

      Randall Hanks

      Ok…I will explain the definition here: You need a “science” degree to
      teach science as in : engineering, astrophysics, chemistry, geology,
      mathematics, physics and so on. Ok ?
      Can we agree on that definition ? I don’t need references to convince you
      about that , right ? This ”science” is the kind you need to understand if
      you want to know the truth about your own planet…
      Science comes from curiosity first. The need to understand. And also by the
      drive of doing things better and make life easier. You want to call that a
      ” philosophy ” ? Go ahead ! That would make every state of mind a
      philosophy. Witch would mean nothing in the end…. But you are not a
      scientific mind. It is obvious.
      I don’t care about how many definitions there are about philosophy. You
      won’t find any definition that would make the Flat Earth theory a valid
      one. And anyone who even consider seriously this theory as a philosophy is
      an uneducated person. Don’t confuse philosophy with faith either. The Flat
      Earthers as well as Creationists, are mostly driven by their faith in
      religion. Most of them in the Bible. Not philosophy of any of the 3
      The most deceiving people are among the right wing religious movement. Of
      all religions. If you can convince young people to die for your faith, how
      more deceiving can this be ?
      As a philosopher , can you tell me who is that “someone” you are referring
      to in ” someone is trying to deceive many people to believe in their
      philosophy” ? Again, everyone has a philosophy of his own following your
      logic… So that someone would be EVERYONE ?

    • +Rodney Haltom
      said: *” please explain how a guy in Alexandria can comunicate with a guy
      in Syene on the same day in the second century BC”*? The guy didn’t.
      Come-on already, Rodney; Are you really this thick, to not understand that
      one *doesn’t need to*? At noon on the longest day of the year, the sun
      stood exactly above a well in Syene, hence it’s reflection on the well’s
      water surface deep beneath the surface; An observation that was notated by
      a dude living there (and probably checked later). While, in Alexandria, on
      that same day, at that same time of day, such a well had a clear *shadow*.
      etc. etc. Is that really so hard to get?

  10. Rename your video “Proof I don’t understand physics using a fly,
    helicopter, smoke, Airy, Devastating footage”

  11. So why when I accidentally drop my phone while driving 100mph does it not
    fly throw my rear window at 100mph?

  12. aaaah? The smoke rising is due to the heat associated with it – not because
    it”s capable of defying gravity. And the fly or any other flying insect
    flies because of the energy it uses in its wings to keep it flying. If it
    stopped suddenly you don’t think it’ll fall to the ground? Really ??

    • FreedomIsApotheosis // 25th Jun 2016 at 8:59 pm // Reply

      @glebeoi You’re using theories you were told since a kid. An intelligent
      person would consider, what if it’s all a lie? Occam’s Razor favors Cpt.
      Obvious. Plato had it right. We are programmed conscious slaves.

    • No I’m not using theories that I learnt as a kid at all. How about I’m
      using the so called theories (as you refer to them) I learnt in training
      and also experienced thru practical hands on encounters whilst being a
      firefighter! If there’s smoke there’s fire and if there’s fire there’s heat
      and unless you learnt otherwise its well documented fact that heat rises.
      Smoke is the by product of a fire and is generally made up of fine unburnt
      solid and liquid particles along with gases which are removed by air caught
      in the rising heat caused by the fire. If there wasn’t a fire (or
      smouldering embers still containing heat) there wouldn’t be any heat and as
      such the particles then wouldn’t be present as smoke. Smoke just doesn’t
      rise up by itself – it needs the assisting force of heat – nothing to do
      with defying gravity. An intelligent person would be able to comprehend
      that fact especially after seeing a fire (of any size) and acknowledge it
      as being true.

    • mjwholesales // 10th Jul 2016 at 11:12 pm // Reply

      BS, the fly is intelligently designed to have a light enough body mass that
      it’s wings allow it to use the atmosphere to push off of no magical gravity
      god required.

  13. Hope you are NOT teaching your kids to be as stupid as you are.
    That 2,000 year old book has all the right answers. Lol

  14. My balls float in water, but out of water they sink, so it’s obvious that
    my ball’s are heavier out of water and gravity dose not exist.

  15. SanMig Light // 14th Jun 2016 at 7:07 pm // Reply

    Dark Matter is Satan and Jesus is the Light. If Satan win Earth then we get
    suck into blackhole. “A space with no stars” .

  16. David Hammond // 14th Jun 2016 at 10:38 pm // Reply

    Well the globe heads say the the Coriolis effect only effects small
    objects like bullets but not large objects like Jets or helicopters. So
    what does it do to bugs are they privy against this force or could anyone
    explain that I mean a butterfly would just be fucked sorry

    • Marc Jacquier // 22nd Jun 2016 at 6:31 am // Reply

      +David Hammond I am not bending theories to fit my believes. It is not me
      who is imaginating desperate theories as a sun looking like a flashlight
      hovering above a flat earth to explain timezones. The global model explains
      all we see so simply. I apply what I know to what I see. theories are
      theories until they are verified. And they are every day : when you are in
      a plane flying at 500mph and you jump, you are not suddenly thrown against
      the rear wall. there is not a magic contact with the floor that keeps you
      in synch with plane and when you jump you’d lose synch and get still in a
      glimpse. you have the same acquired speed than the plane. you got gradually
      the same speed than plane. during acceleration you feel it pushing you in
      your seat. but you can’t feel speed, only accelerations. you never been in
      a train in a station close to another train and see that other train start
      moving slowly until you see the background and realise that it is YOUR
      train moving ? I had this experience when I was a child it taught me what
      some yars later I learned as “frame of reference”. and I am very far from a
      genius. the helicopter hovering above ground is like you in the plane. It
      has the same speed as earth even when in the air which has the same speed
      as the globe so we feel like it is static….

    • David Hammond // 22nd Jun 2016 at 1:17 pm // Reply

      +Marc Jacquier You want to talk airplanes then why when we fly East rather
      than west against the supposed spin we don’t have different speeds and
      how do you land an east bound flight on a north south runway that is moving
      one thousand mph . Now go away your programmed until you realize and admit
      that you are stuck bro

    • Toffie Koorsteen // 23rd Jun 2016 at 11:02 pm // Reply

      +David Hammond like i said earlier… relative gravity is it so hard to

  17. seriously. You don’t want to answer my question? I want to understand your
    point of view. I love the flat earth theory. i think it falls over when
    people in the southern hemisphere look ‘out’ to the south and see the same

  18. Im with you on the scientific fraud posed with the modern globe model. But
    using the insects was not very updated. As they use to beieve they defied
    gravity because the displacement was not right. But sense then we have
    found the buzzing of the wings makes the insect skin weightless. research
    it. Im not sure which key words but Id say,, Honey Bee research anti
    gravity.. Itl blow your mind what you find..

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Share This