Latest News

39 Comments on Fire and Ice Theory (FIT) – Part 1

  1. Brian Mullin // 10th Apr 2016 at 3:56 am // Reply

    I forgot to mention the sounds of the GoFast rocket, turn the volume up. To
    me it sounds like it could be immersed in water or some kind of liquid.
    Amazing stuff.

    • Brian.. it is quite odd that it would suddenly stop spinning.. however.. if
      it is some kind of liquid, why is there no disturbance of said fluid ?
      wouldn’t you expect to see at least some bubbles?

    • also.. when the rocket reaches it’s near peak.. and the lower rocket
      detaches… because they are so high up… wouldn’t it just “appear” as if
      they are floating? also.. the Rockets trajectory was a parabola correct? it
      be that they hadn’t yet reached the peak… so it looked like they were
      floating…

    • Greg McGunigal // 26th May 2016 at 8:14 am // Reply

      You need to stick your tongue out some more… but CURL IT!

    • ddmeltzer8 // 2nd Jul 2016 at 8:39 am // Reply

      Great video,as always!
      First of all,the sound could be due to the microphone being inside the
      rocket-tube.If u put a tube over ur ear u would experience a similar effect.
      And secondly,the rocket could have some sort of “collapsing” cone,but it
      still has to be hitting something…
      I`m just trying to be super-critical to everything,and that way stay away
      from “false evidence” and away from making too many ad-Hoc theories.
      But there is definetivly something other than the “official physics” going
      on here!!!
      Stay classy,man!

    • Luc Lessard // 14th Jul 2016 at 10:08 pm // Reply

      Unfortunately there is no TCG marks or Zulu time associated to the vid. So
      everything is speculation…..

  2. Brian Mullin // 10th Apr 2016 at 1:21 pm // Reply

    So it looks like YouTube put an ad on this video. I have not monetized this
    account and never planned to do so. I’m going to try and fight this, but I
    fear they may not take it down.

    • Gary Morgan // 8th May 2016 at 4:14 pm // Reply

      +mark Draco I do? Where did you get that from?

      I have read William Thomas, listened to interviews of Nick Begich and the
      very limited interviews of Dr Bernard Eastlund.

      I am aware of the military owning hundreds of patents of weather
      modification technology and I live on the west coast!

      But Reich built the only machine that can measure orgone energy. Never
      repeated or confirmed. Scientifically that means it didn’t happen.

      Now bigfoot? That’s bullshit.

    • mark Draco // 8th May 2016 at 4:53 pm // Reply

      +Gary Morgan So you don’t believe in ch’i/Qi/Prana these are the same life
      energy different names but all real.I know that people like you believe
      hard line proof but feel nothing with their heart or mind.This energy is
      real…up to you wether or not you believe it.

    • Gary Morgan // 8th May 2016 at 5:44 pm // Reply

      +mark Draco well nothing has been shown to be more than a fraud, a hoax or
      a misrepresentation.

      But the flat earth? Come on. Do you just buy any metaphysical tripe that is
      out there?

      Stop digging and get out of the hole!

    • mark Draco // 8th May 2016 at 7:34 pm // Reply

      +Gary Morgan It must be sad where you are..

    • Gary Morgan // 8th May 2016 at 8:25 pm // Reply

      +mark Draco yeah… reality is tough

  3. Brian Mullin // 10th Apr 2016 at 6:45 pm // Reply

    I’ll do a separate video on the GoFast rocket, it’s too interesting to try
    to work out in comment responses. Also this video is supposed to be about
    FIT :)

    • Tony Starks // 14th Apr 2016 at 3:33 pm // Reply

      if u point the reader at the moon it go off the chart just to the left of
      the moon or right 100 below

    • Peaches & Speeches // 22nd Apr 2016 at 3:37 am // Reply

      +Brian Mullin Hey I just noticed you have the charges backwards on the sun
      and moon. Because the sun is giving I assumed it was positive as well but
      kinetic is always negative.

    • PeterSweden // 26th Apr 2016 at 5:14 pm // Reply

      +Brian Mullin Dont fall into the new age trap, it sounds like you are. New
      age is not the answer – the bible is. God is male, not female.

      & the whole babylonian system & false gods are based on sun & moon worship.
      nimrod / baal & semiramis / isis.

      Read the bible & see how it talks about water in the heavens & firmament.
      It explains everything we are starting to see about flat earth.

    • ThePottersClay // 26th Apr 2016 at 9:29 pm // Reply

      +PeterSweden
      Well said Brother.

    • Brian how can I contact you?

  4. Water in space? Scuba tanks “too”? hmmm….

  5. FlatEarth Photography // 15th Apr 2016 at 5:27 pm // Reply

    wow Brian, thank you for all the work. So many profound ideas in one video.
    peace to you. I am looking forward to more videos!

  6. snack to the future // 16th Apr 2016 at 11:28 am // Reply

    can you please compare/analyze the thermoelectric effect in conjunction
    with the heat/plasma exchange of the thermo layer? Like a peltier junction
    where the atmosphere acts as a semiconductor. Differences in atmospheric
    density act as a step down transformer. Please look at a diagram of a
    Peltier system. Peace

  7. Johnny Conger // 23rd Apr 2016 at 8:20 pm // Reply

    Enjoying this journey so much…I think our final destination is going to
    blow our minds…appy days…

  8. Killer video, Brian. My family and I had dinner and watched.

  9. I am hearing this idea more and more. Great work Brian, I like sharing your
    videos, and am so glad that you are making them. The waters above, and the
    waters below. I’ve seen many videos now that show stars that appear to be
    seen through water as well. That shimmer effect on the moon that we always
    see, that scientists have attributed to “atmospheric effect”, also looks
    like it might be in water.

  10. IlluminatiWillFail // 29th Apr 2016 at 6:04 pm // Reply

    I do got a question though, that rocket reached about 73 miles up , yet on
    my channel I uploaded a video of a Hyshot rocket that reached 186 miles, or
    300 km, how would this rocket that only went 73 miles stop when the hyshot
    one reached almost twice that height? Although the footage isn’t that great
    and a bit messy, you can still tell what’s going on I wanna know what you
    think about it. One thing to note though, when you see the hyshot rocket or
    payload thing take off slowly the camera recording it gets covered in what
    looks like wet moisture? Kind of weird. Unless you think they’re lying
    about the height they reached on the hyshot. Not sure what to think.

  11. ryan thompson // 11th May 2016 at 3:52 am // Reply

    What do you think the divinity is man?

  12. Michael Hansen // 13th May 2016 at 12:29 pm // Reply

    You are forgetting one very important factor. The rocket has momentum away
    from the Earth. So what you really should do is throw a ball upwards and
    then see that at the apex of the upward movement, the ball will come to a
    stand still, until it gains downward momentum because of gravity.

    I would argue that you can’t measure the velocity of the rocket just by
    looking at the external view camera. It could very well still have upward
    momentum.

    Oh yes, one final comment. If you want discuss science then keep religion
    out if it. Completely. It is utterly irrelevant what scripture says or says
    not!

    • Brian Mullin // 13th May 2016 at 12:37 pm // Reply

      Yes, I went over this in more detail in FIT part 2. What is interesting is
      how much faster the lower stage falls than the upper stage. At 117 km there
      should be hardly any matter, therefore the two stages should accelerate
      down at the same rate. The upper stage appears to kind of “float”, and
      there does not appear to be any acceleration when the two stages separate,
      so my conclusion is that it is not a forced separation.

    • Michael Hansen // 13th May 2016 at 1:06 pm // Reply

      You have to consider a potentian difference in velocity from the
      separation. If the mass of the second (final) stage is less than the mass
      of the first stage, then the gained velocity if the final stage will be
      higher.

      Lets say that the final momentum before separation is
      P ~ 764000 N s
      (Here I used that total mass of the rocket is 500 kg (without fuel) and the
      velocity before separation is 1520 m/s.)

      Then the gained velocity will be given by v = P / m. Lets further say that
      the mass of stage one is 350 kg and the mass of stage two is 150 kg.
      Then the new velocity if stage one will be
      v1 = 764000 N s / 350 kg ~ 2129 m/s
      and for stage two
      v2 = 764000 N s / 150 kg ~ 5093 m/s.
      Just to illustrate. The real numbers are most likely different.

      I would argue that you can’t really say anything real about the direction
      of movement nor velocity at that distance.
      So even though it might seem to be still, it could actually be moving
      either upwards or downwards and you wouldn’t notice until much closer to
      the surface of the Earth.

      Btw. Is it just me or do I detect a bit of curvature? I know it is probably
      a fisheye lens, but still.

    • Michael Hansen // 19th May 2016 at 7:45 pm // Reply

      +rudy peterson
      What is?

  13. noonesflower // 17th May 2016 at 12:43 pm // Reply

    Lads! It’s a brainy engineer doing physics on a white board, with extremely
    neat writing, and he knows how to tie it all in with the truths of the
    current imbalance between the divine masculine and divine feminine–What’s
    not to like?!!

  14. Greg McGunigal // 26th May 2016 at 8:50 am // Reply

    Somthing else (as opposed to the Moon and
    Sun……………………………………………………are
    conrolling the weather system! s

  15. Man you should check out Wilhelm Reichs work on orgone energy

  16. 1906Farnsworth // 9th Jun 2016 at 10:10 am // Reply

    The rocket did not stop. It did not hit a barrier. It did not fall
    “slowly”. It fell with the expected acceleration of gravity. It may appear
    “slow” with no nearby references. The only near reference would be the
    other stage, which would be under the same acceleration after its fuel is
    expended.

    The sudden change in rotation was due to a device that changed the Rocket’s
    moment of inertia, which quite naturally changed its rotation rate.

    NOTHING THE LEAST BIT WEIRD IS IN EVIDENCE.

    If the rocket broke through the dome, is the water continuing to leak in?

    • Brian Mullin // 9th Jun 2016 at 11:22 am // Reply

      Did not know about the Yo-Yo despin devices when I filmed this. See oart 2
      for a better breakdown.

  17. The Sun is female & the Moon is male, female is the giver male receiver.
    Look at all creatures, female give berth, give the base of life.
    Sun give heat & Moon absorb it

  18. Spherical Earth Community // 8th Jul 2016 at 4:46 am // Reply

    Probably one of your worst videos to date. Keep up the “good” work.

  19. Crafty Cheri // 14th Jul 2016 at 1:30 am // Reply

    Brilliant Brian, thanks! Congrats on your new wife and life God Bless you
    both!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


Shares
Share This