Latest News

Moon Craters Debunked 100% Proof

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

In this video I confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that the moon's craters are not formed by effects from asteroids, comets and meteors. Round craters are throughout the moon's surface, nonetheless to develop a circular crater the effect should after that come from a directly and also down 90 level angle. My concern is where are all the influence trails, canyons, ditches, trenches, scratches and also scrapes? There must be countless effects that took place at numerous angles which would create different kinds of effect marks besides circular influence craters. Are we to think all the moon's craters were from dead on 90 level angle crashes? In my experiments carried out in the video I demonstrate exactly how high rate influences at numerous angles do not constantly leave a round crater as well as in most cases it does not. Therefore we need to ask why the moon's surface is covered with thousands of circular effect craters while there are essentially zero effect trails, canyons, gouges, ditches, scrapes as well as scrapes. Undoubtedly mainstream science is not only incorrect, yet they are lying and also for that reason we should decline mainstream science and reopen real clinical investigation while using the true scientific technique.


93 Comments on Moon Craters Debunked 100% Proof

  1. Edgar Duran // 17th Feb 2017 at 11:13 am // Reply

    I’m packing a bowl.

  2. 238857 miles away and you can still see the moon clear with your phone camera … fking nasa

    • JMS Infrastructure Consultancies Llc // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:33 pm // Reply

      LilD100 How is it impossible when you know that we have planes that can simply fly over and observe an edge?

    • johnathan bowman // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:33 pm // Reply

      +JMS Infrastructure Consultancies Llc In the flat-earth model the sun and moon are both close and small. The height and size of both has been debated on however, they are both identical in size. In my opinion I think the sun is about 30 miles across and varies from 200000 to 500000 feet in altitude, but this is only my opinion, based on amateur high altitude balloon footage. As for the model , take a look at the Gleason’s azimuthal equidistant map. Pay particular attention to the lower left hand and right hand corners that describe the summer solstice and the winter solstice and this should give you a basic idea of what most flat-earthers believe the model is.

    • JMS Infrastructure Consultancies Llc no planes fly near Antarctica though so thats a myth my bro your not even aloud to go to Antarctica unless your travels are completely controlled looll thats my point other wise we would know the answer

  3. Edgar Duran // 17th Feb 2017 at 11:20 am // Reply

    Why do they only hit the moon and not the earth?

  4. NathanOakley1980 // 17th Feb 2017 at 11:28 am // Reply

    Good point. They look like electric scarification marks to me.

    • John Tarot // 17th Feb 2017 at 4:00 pm // Reply

      +Tymist the moon produces its own light. Cold light opposite of the sun which produces warm light. This has been tested and proved, and many videos showing the test.

    • +John Tarot

      I am trying to understand your theory…so :

      1) what is the moon’s shape ? Is it a disk ? a sphere ?
      2) Why would the moon change its emitting light patern ? From totally “round” full moon, to completely off ?

    • John Tarot // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:15 pm // Reply

      From what we know it is merely a Light. I personally dont know of the shape. The luminaries are said to be for signs in all of the spiritual texts of the world. So the changing of its light is some sort of cycle/pattern for us to use. thats my theory.

    • Knowledge Scavenger // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:25 pm // Reply

      I posted a link above to an article explaining the electrical nature of crater formation: .

    • notaras1985 // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:38 pm // Reply

      Electric Universe scientific paradigm says exactly that. even on earth there is electric scarring. but they are globists as well.

  5. another thing…moon always keeps the same side towards earth…if impacts were at 90 degrees, how did those asteroids pass through the earth to strike the moon?

    • +Graham Rathbone​ when did I say I was a scientist?? The only thing i said about scientist was on the article about the wild heretic and the SCIENTIFIC experiments he posted debunked a spinning globe. I don’t know how the far the sun is. That kind of sensitive information is being withheld. I also stated that I don’t know everything that I actually truely know very little but I know enough that I believe the heliocentric model is wrong….go back and read the thread…btw I like how you don’t deny you’re a paid shill…I commend you for that atleast

    • S.I. Trigg // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:45 pm // Reply

      Take this big fat L omg wow.

    • Graham Rathbone // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:46 pm // Reply

      +Matt Holt Concentrate, captain honest.

      I’m not interested in your beliefs and that includes you crying that I’m a shill. I’d think you need to grow up and stop using a religious trick that helps you deny evidence.

      Poisoning the well is a fallacy. An OLD one.

      “That kind of sensitive information is being withheld. ”


      Remember “parallax”.
      What kind of marvel comic do you live in, FFS?
      You’re denying information available to even children so they can TEST it.

      “SCIENTIFIC experiments he posted debunked a spinning globe.”


      Scientific “looking”?
      Where are the peer review documents?

      So you failed for the third time to give the numbers, and it was for the math YOU ASKED ME TO DO.

      See how honest YOU are coming across here? You see why some “globers” start calling you names after you do thins little dance?

    • +Graham Rathbone those same calculations can be made by a closer and more local sun. That article proves nothing to me

  6. good points about angles. never even crossed my mind.

    • Andrew Jackson // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:16 pm // Reply

      Dude it’s just like the big bang man and that particle accelerator in Switzerland. The energy created from a meteor is so biblical it could create a blackhole or even destroy the entire universe and space time continuum.

    • Yeah man, they are also magical, because no matter which angle they fall from, they always leave a symmetrical circular crater and nothing else, defying logic, reason and physics. But I guess those 3 things don’t matter these days, because why would they when we have “official NASA” explanations for everything that sheeple don’t question ?

    • Of course, just ignore the fact that the mechanism has been thoroughly studied and thoroughly modeled. Ignore the fact that shock cones are found in the surrounding rock (a feature that can only be replicated with very high energy explosives), throw out all logic and empiricism… it certainly is easy to be a flathead. Here’s a straight forward discussion of the physics involed – kindly point out the physical laws that have been violated:

      As for your comment that a meteor is the least likely explanation for the Tunguska, you’re a loon.

  7. VinsterGaming // 17th Feb 2017 at 11:36 am // Reply

    Hey, FEA.
    Could you debunk CoolHardLogic’s video/s on the flat earth entitled “Testing Flattards”? Thank you!
    Keep up the good work!

    • Jackie Chan // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:00 pm // Reply

      He can try but he won’t succeed. FEA will need actual facts if he wants success

    • Flat 4 Life // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:31 pm // Reply

      VinsterGaming I think Rob Skibba did a good job debunking CHL. Also wasn’t CHL the same guy who showed a video of someone cutting the top off an orange to prove spherical earth? So let me prove to you the earth is spherical by cutting off the top of an orange and making it flat…I nearly pissed myself.

  8. Bruno Fontaine // 17th Feb 2017 at 11:40 am // Reply

    Expect if the source impact was comming from Earth…
    And the Arizona crater is more like an old quarry.

    • Roboterson // 17th Feb 2017 at 1:51 pm // Reply

      Ok so who made it and what did they mine, we can only do that size of mine due to the great advances in technology we have made and due to the large cost involved there needs to be a reason to dig.

    • hopespringseternal70 // 17th Feb 2017 at 2:56 pm // Reply

      we don’t know our true histories, yet. what we have been told is baloney. check out anatoly fomenko’s work on our real timelines.

    • Bruno Fontaine // 17th Feb 2017 at 3:01 pm // Reply

      If it’s conceited to say that we are the only intelligent form of life on the universe.
      It is also conceited to say that we are the most advanced civilisation even seen on earth.
      A lot of advanced/ancient construtions in the world cannot be reproduced with our actual technology.

    • Nunya Biznes // 17th Feb 2017 at 5:04 pm // Reply

      hopespringseternal70 If you want to know our true history, read and study the KJV bible. Stop living in the world! It’s satan’s snare.

    • Nate Jones // 17th Feb 2017 at 7:29 pm // Reply

      Bruno Fontaine I know where you’re coming from.. but it turns out everything we’ve been told isn’t actually what it seems to be. the thing about humans being the only intelligent forms of life in the universe(or world since space isn’t real according to FE) is a lie in and of itself. of course there exists many intelligent life forms that are not aliens but native to our world! yes and I believe we’ve been told that to trick us into feeling safe thinking that we’re the dominant species and there’s nothing out there more intelligent than us that could cause harm to us. oh but there are specially the cryptids that have been discovered like bigfoot or dogman but still no scientific evidence about them or maybe they have but are keeping it a secret. that’s the governmental way of doing things folks. these are creatures from hell born to cause chaos and destruction and I think the government is in league with these evil beings. but to contradict what I said.. we are still the dominating population.

      i heard that there used to exist a human civilisation that was vastly more intelligent than us including their technology. they were wiped out without a trace. somehow it leads me to believe that those civilisations were the ones who created the monoliths that we see today.

      lastly I think all these so called aliens are nothing but inter dimensional demons or angelic spirits that manifest occasionally in to our 3d plane due to a probable glitch in their vibrating frequencies or if they wanted to expose themselves on purpose. we do not need the idea of an infinitely stretching, indefinite universe to say that it’s inhabited by variety of aliens. our world itself is vast and big enough to harbour all manor of creatures including the ones we cannot see; “aliens”.. and to top it off our world hasn’t exactly been fully explored either. i therefore I believe that science is actually a tool disguised as a sane logic to our reality but in *actual reality* it’s used to dumb us down ⬇ and limit our own potential and make us blind in our preception of the ultimate reality without us ever realising it. each and every one of us are bestowed the gifts and grace of God when we are born. we are all made with a little part of God inside of us as we’re made in his image

  9. how is there craters when the moon is always facing us. how can things even hit the moon from that angle unless its coming from the earth

    • The Antagonist you have no clue what you are talking about, you are just parroting what you have been told.

    • +World has been Corrupted Yes he is, you are absolutely correct.

    • Christopher Merten // 17th Feb 2017 at 7:55 pm // Reply

      I think that it was either man’s doing or natural volcanic activity at one time. almost as if maybe we had two suns at one time or another!

  10. Mark Lloyd // 17th Feb 2017 at 11:58 am // Reply

    Has anybody ever see anything hit the moon?

    • Mark Lloyd // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:22 pm // Reply

      +The Antagonist
      How do you personally KNOW that the moon is that old? Have you been here the whole 4.53 billion years? Are you believing (having Faith/religion of) in the ‘experts’ of science (scientism is a religion) and their carbon dating, which has been proven to be false many times, of ‘moon rocks’ they claim to be from the moon? Have you personally examined these things? Are you believing (having faith in) your education (government approved learning) at ‘Univers-ity’ or school? Are you believing (having faith in) NASA (not a space agency, a military branch) and their CGI, composite, artist’s renderings that they call “Pictures” of earth? Do you believe in the Astro-not-s who claim to have gone to the moon, but won’t swear on a Holy Bible that they did?? Where is the Proof (Facts!) to defend their Theories? Where is the real, repeatable, observable, mathematically correct, scientific Proof? They have None. They have Only Theory, Assumptions, Hypothesis, and ‘junk’ math!

      What is the name of the ‘famous scientists’ who proved gravity??

    • Mark Lloyd // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:26 pm // Reply

      +Don Lee
      The truth is smacking you in the face, it is also right above you. The earth is flat and Outer Space is a big fat lie…all of it!! Here’s a clue….It takes 8 minutes for light from the sun to reach us. The sun is 92.96 million miles away,…. SO, if I send a message to someone on the sun, it would take 8 minutes to get to them and another 8 minutes to receive a reply because wireless communication travels at the speed of light. Europa is 390.4 million miles away. SO,… 390.4 ÷ 92.96 = 4.1 × 8 = 32.8 So it would take radio communications 32.8 minutes to reach Europa, and another 32.8 to get a signal back to earth. these NASA spacecrafts and rovers must be autonomous or artificial intelligence because there is NO way to remote control something that is getting a radio signal 32 minutes later.

    • +Mark Lloyd I agree with u 100%

    • +Mark Lloyd Hot damn….I freakin love u dude… u are so on point…

  11. Arain Light // 17th Feb 2017 at 12:02 pm // Reply

    The comments make me want to die.

  12. I’m a fan of F.E.A. ! Great point. I’m not even sure those are craters on the Moon.

  13. Rottie Robben // 17th Feb 2017 at 12:20 pm // Reply

    common misconception. upon impact, meteors explode due to intense energies. Craters are created by explosions, not the meteor hitting the ground and carving a path. 23 min video debunked with one comment. move on people, nothing to watch.

    • Justin Kemp // 17th Feb 2017 at 5:47 pm // Reply

      John Tarot okay, you assume that an explosion has to be a combustion explosion like a gas canister exploding creating the fireball and what have you. however, there are different types of explosions. the kind that creates the craters on the moon are not caused by combustion explosions but as i said by the explosion created with the transfer of kenetic energy from one object to another, in this case an asteroid in the moon.

    • John Tarot // 17th Feb 2017 at 5:50 pm // Reply

      Yes so give me a practical example of this. Otherwise its a theory based upon made up assertions

    • Justin Kemp // 17th Feb 2017 at 5:57 pm // Reply

      John Tarot it’s not a theory with made up assertions at all. its a proven fact. have you ever dropped a dish and it broke apart on the floor? seen a video of a watermelon being shot with a rifle? watched a ball fall into a patch of sand? or how about the splash created by someone doing a cannonball into a pool? these are all examples of kenetic energy impacts. Do i need to go on? i could provide many more examples.

    • Ralph Farmer // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:16 pm // Reply

      John Tarot They haven’t done real experiments since the beast system was installed.

    • John Tarot // 17th Feb 2017 at 7:05 pm // Reply

      I see what you are saying but youre confusing the word break with explode. A dish doesnt explode on the ground when you drop it, it breaks because of the material its made out of and the properties of that material. That said though this is unrelated, you are claiming that a meteor crashing at an angle greater or less than 90 degrees will create a circular impact creator because of a kinetic energy explosion. You still have not provided an example of where an object shot at an angle other than 90 creates a circular impact creator in dirt (or a similar medium) with no dig or canyon.

  14. I have been thinking about the moon craters and have come to one conclusion. The moons creator all came from the same angle 90 degrees. The origin of these craters originated from our earth! I have been saying this for a long time now – The craters were created from the Giants who once walked this flat plane throwing objects at the moon in an effort to destroy Gods creation. One thing must be realized here, the very first offspring of the Fallen Angels and human women were the purest offspring and the product of this offspring were the tallest of the tallest of the giants. Were talking 3000 to 6000 feet tall. Yes, just over a mile high. Jeff Skiba also thinks Giants of this magnitude once existed also. The moon is close and they would have no problem hitting the moon with all sorts of methods only a hybrid angel, (which is what a Giant is) would know off. That’s how I see all the marks on the moon were created. One thing for sure is, they all came from earth because they are from the same direction! Peace and all glory and honor belongs to our Lord and savior Jesus Christ. Hallelujah!

    • Rottie Robben // 17th Feb 2017 at 12:34 pm // Reply

      Wrong, they come from all angles. Meteors explode, they don’t carve a path through the surface.

    • I’m not wrong, what do you mean by all angles? Please explain. You said meteors, how do you know they were meteors? Also, where are the paths you speak of? They are all direct hits, I do not see any angled craters on the moon.

    • Rottie Robben // 17th Feb 2017 at 12:55 pm // Reply

      They explode, hence they do NOT carve a path, don’t you understand?

    • I understand but I think your not understanding. I never said they carve a path.

  15. Peter Ganz // 17th Feb 2017 at 12:29 pm // Reply

    If you believe in the heliocentric model, there should be no asteroid impacts on the visual side of the moon, as earth gravity would direct them towards earth.

    • 9pt9 The Moon orbits around the Earth and many asteroids travel well above escape velocity so Earths gravity would barely effect the trajectory. Velocity according.

    • The Antagonist u all talk about what school and google learn u. but u personaly , never mesure the speed of those ore witness a asteroid hit earth ore moon.why u think its called falling stars? becose its what they are.

    • +Vas Me
      You can track near-earth objects ( asteroids ) with a telescope and given how the rate at which it covers arc-seconds you can get the velocity of the object. Falling stars are objects hitting the atmosphere at 30,000+mph.

    • JMS Infrastructure Consultancies Llc // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:20 pm // Reply

      Vas Me it’s called “falling stars” because that is what the ancient people back in the day thought that they were when observing them, really how stupid can you be?

    • Joshua Sanders // 17th Feb 2017 at 7:47 pm // Reply

      Peter Ganz true

  16. mark wells // 17th Feb 2017 at 12:52 pm // Reply

    john b wells is a fag

  17. Apollo 957 // 17th Feb 2017 at 1:53 pm // Reply

    Craters are formed by the shock wave resulting from the impact. The mass of the meteor, plus the speed, dictates the energy put into the shock wave.

    The shock wave, regardless of angle of impact, radiates hemisperically from the centre, leading a a broadly hemisphere-shaped crater, which, to the observer from Earth, is circular.

    Your experiment lacks the scale to reproduce this.

    Go on, google “how are craters formed”, then ….

    • Zach Brown // 17th Feb 2017 at 7:16 pm // Reply

      D Mag ok so why does it get harder for the rocket to ascend if the air gets thinner the higher you go. wouldnt it just make it easier. and why is it amateur rockets dont need to do that

    • +Zach Brown
      “ok so why does it get harder for the rocket to ascend if the air gets thinner the higher you go.”  It doesnt. It gets easier. Rocket engine performance increases with less atmospheric pressure. They need to get over the thick atmosphere so they dont plow through it and burn up trying to get to orbital velocity.      “why is it amateur rockets dont need to do that”   Amateur rockets are not orbital class vehicles. They go up as high as possible then simply fall back down. They dont and physically cannot accelerate to orbital velocity. Need to burn engines for 8 -15 minutes to do that. Thats way out of the range for amateurs.

    • Zach Brown // 17th Feb 2017 at 7:49 pm // Reply

      D Magthats my bad on the way i worded it. but thats what im saying it gets easier the higher you go and that gofast 2014 rocket looked like it made it pretty damn close with out having to ark.

    • GoFast only hit 3,500mph. Not even close to the 17,500mph needed to orbit the planet. It reached space, but not orbit. The two are different. 17,500mph is the outward energy you need to balance out the inward pull of gravity to then circle the planet and stay in space without expending more energy. GoFast is a class of rocket known as a Sounding Rocket. They’re SUB-orbital rockets.

    • Zach Brown // 17th Feb 2017 at 9:29 pm // Reply

      D Mag im just gonna agree to disagree lol. no hard feelings hope you have a great day.

  18. Using Hollywood images as base for “100% proof”? Ok then…. 😀

    • Exactly. Also since we cannot find them here on earth and they must be created by Hollywood somehow translates to where are they at on the moon?Thousands of articles,experiments on crater formation,erosion etc but whats the point. It will all be written off as NASA cgi,illuiminati trickery.

    • Using NASA images as base for “100% proof”? Okay then…. XD

  19. Flat 4 Life // 17th Feb 2017 at 2:24 pm // Reply

    I called NASA and asked why are they lying to us about moon craters, they said they haven’t been…all the canyons and dig marks are on the dark side. They have an answer for everything LOL

  20. Brian Mabbett // 17th Feb 2017 at 5:39 pm // Reply

    F E A I think you have missed one crucial point , and that is as we only see one face of the moon 24/7/365 days a year , The meteorite would have to pass through the Earth to hit the Moon at 90 degrees  … work that into your thinking and good luck ..

    • Brian Mabbett It couldn’t… pass next to it? All the space between and the meteor HAS to pass through the Earth to hit the moon? Even if the moon is orbiting the Earth? You sure about that?

    • Brian Mabbett // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:08 pm // Reply

      Think about it …

    • +Brian Mabbett
      I already thought about it and what you say makes no sense what so ever. So an asteroid cannot pass close to the Earth and hit the moon? “Buut the earths gravity!” No, the object is traveling at or greater than escape velocity. Try educating yourself.

    • Brian Mabbett // 17th Feb 2017 at 6:16 pm // Reply


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Share This