Latest News

Planet X on 2nd. Balloon Launch?

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

A mysterious item appeared on all 3 cams on the balloon launch of 10/3/15 and also the item moved gradually in connection with the climbing sun. Some video showed two objects. Although it might be a lens style – we do not think it is with all of the video footage until now. The other opportunities include the moon, Venus or??? More full footage later.

No Phony Faith Channel: https: c nofakereligion.
I could be called at nofakereligion @

45 Comments on Planet X on 2nd. Balloon Launch?

  1. SpaceFish // 4th Oct 2015 at 5:19 am // Reply

    GPS cutting out??
    it wouldn’t be because there are no satellites and everything is
    ground-based would it???

    • SpaceFish // 4th Oct 2015 at 6:07 pm // Reply

      I agree 100% !!!

    • mineben256 // 8th Oct 2015 at 8:51 pm // Reply

      Yuup da gubernmint shels cnt lye 4 mush lawngr. Da troof iz reveled!!!

    • John Christian // 27th Nov 2015 at 7:48 am // Reply

      +Aidan Berry
      Prove it, since you are making that claim, but just realize, showing us a
      picture of a satellite that NASA has sitting in some room doesn’t count or
      showing us an animated picture of a so-called satellite doesn’t count
      either. Also, when you are doing your research, look at the temperatures
      of where they claim these satellites are…Temperatures soar beyond the
      melting point and cameras melt, so does the glass that covers them…so
      please go do your research and you’ll find that you are not as correct as
      you think you are, but I don’t want you to believe me. I want you to prove
      it to yourself by doing the research…Have a Great Day!!!

    • Andrew Seelp // 27th Dec 2015 at 9:48 pm // Reply

      +ItsAlwaysGod oClock except for the people that jumped out the windows

  2. Dean Muhl // 4th Oct 2015 at 6:22 am // Reply

    The sun’s hotspot can clearly be seen . That proves the sun is very close.

    • Sigma Octantis // 24th Nov 2015 at 6:00 am // Reply

      +Dean Muhl Vacuum’s don’t suck, pressure pushes. There is just enough
      gravity to hold air molecules close enough together to create atmospheric
      pressure near the surface of Earth. Makes sense to me…

    • Sigma Octantis // 24th Nov 2015 at 11:40 am // Reply

      +Aidan Berry Well it is a vacuum, you just can’t compare it to a vacuum

    • Sigma Octantis // 24th Nov 2015 at 11:59 am // Reply

      +Aidan Berry Well yes, a vacuum is full of subatomic particles but it still
      is a vacuum (void of atoms).

  3. Barry Sumner // 4th Oct 2015 at 7:35 am // Reply

    Confused skeptic truth seeker asks?
    truth bomb! stars can be photos circling both north and south poles FACT!
    That can’t happen on a flat earth model Fact!
    comments please:-)

  4. Big thank you to all the team,awesome result. So good the payload was
    retrievable even with the earth spinning so fast ,looks like a little local
    storm blew it back, flat earth luck I guess.really interesting ,Much
    appreciated, cheers.

  5. Alex Werner (Callanan) // 4th Oct 2015 at 8:41 am // Reply

    A question, why do you send it from Chestow and not from the extreme south
    of Africa or extreme south of South-America ? It would be a better way to
    prove the truth no ?

    • Rory Mcfizz // 4th Oct 2015 at 10:06 am // Reply

      I would think it’s the cost ,not cheap to do this stuff, but looks flat to
      me,great work ,I’m in UK and can see iles of white from over 50 plus
      miles,from where I am on the coast, not possible on ball,booooooooomfizzzzz

  6. mark Draco // 4th Oct 2015 at 11:00 am // Reply

    That’s the asteroid on route to earth ….or is it

    • TheRichie213 // 5th Oct 2015 at 1:02 am // Reply

      +mark Draco Hopefully

    • mark Draco // 24th Nov 2015 at 5:27 pm // Reply

      Who is this Jebus ? The worlds leaders are doing the comets job if you
      hadn’t noticed the world is closing around us in the name of terror which
      they are creating .

  7. If the balloon went that high and for so long it should have ended up
    1000’s of miles away if the earth was spinning.

    • We have all heard of Gravity, that magical force that no one can truly
      define or prove through scientific methods that miraculously attracts
      things o the center of a ball. This same magical force that would crush
      you at the North Pole, but perfectly pulls on “planets” to keep them in
      their magical orbits. Yes, I have heard of it and not sure why someone
      that is so educated has to use the word moron.

      Go ahead and enlighten us “morons” on your definition of gravity and not a
      copy and paste of a Wikipedia entry.

      BTW…if you want to say that your reasoning for the earth being a ball is
      backed up by Gravity, then you could say the same thing about it on a flat

  8. zomby woof // 4th Oct 2015 at 1:10 pm // Reply

    A night launch would be the ultimate proof. Consider this. A streetlight
    lights up a limited area beneath it, but you can see the streetlight itself
    from miles away. Many, many miles. Although the Sun may light up a limited
    amount of the Earth below it, it is a very bright streetlight indeed. If
    you get above most of the atmosphere and all of the dust and haze, there
    will be no atmospheric extinction. And because the Sun is always 3,000
    miles high, you would have a STRAIGHT line of sight toward it with nothing
    in the way: no mountains, no clouds, and no atmospheric extinction. Even a
    normal lens should be able to see it, even at local midnight. Easily. The
    Moon would also be visible, no matter what side of Earth it was on at the

    I also suggest one launch with cameras with a powerful telephoto lens. Once
    you are above most of the atmosphere and the dust and haze and so forth,
    the camera should be able to see for ten thousands miles. (No atmospheric
    extinction.) An 86x telephoto would see the Antarctic ice wall easily. And
    it would be visible in ANY direction, since the ice wall surrounds us. And
    it wouldn’t matter whether you launch by day or night, because half of the
    Earth is always lit up. It would be impossible not to see it.

    • zomby woof // 5th Oct 2015 at 1:16 am // Reply

      +Yute Hube The balloon is at 100,000 feet. The Sun is at X miles above the
      flat Earth. The balloon doesn’t have to be at the same height as the Sun
      for the line of sight to be straight.

      A straight line. Not a flat angle. The angle will be up but the line will
      be straight, And the angle won’t be all that much because the Sun will be
      thousands of miles away across the Earth at local midnight.

      But the balloon is above most of the atmosphere at that height. It will
      be above all mountains, all clouds, and the haze and dust. The Sun should
      be easily visible.

  9. lets rebuild // 4th Oct 2015 at 2:17 pm // Reply

    we all should launch one at the same time from around the world one at
    night and one in the mourning and send all information to one person
    compile the info and make video

  10. James Bondage // 4th Oct 2015 at 3:44 pm // Reply

    Hi Rich,
    Click on this link ( It will
    automatically download a PDF file from Nasa’s archive called “Derivation
    and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model (P. 1988)” go to page 35 & scroll
    down to the bottom where it says “Concluding Remarks”. #FlatEarthProof

    Hope this helps.

    • James Bondage // 5th Oct 2015 at 11:05 am // Reply

      +OathOfGod I was wondering if anyone else had come across it. & then I saw
      a guy post something about it on YouTube. I watched it, & liked it, & then
      about 10 minutes later it got deleted, for some odd reason … Well, we
      kinda know the answer to that, don’t we.

    • // 24th Dec 2015 at 3:59 am // Reply

      +Aidan Berry Really intelligent argument you got there, thanks.

  11. Steve Blakey // 4th Oct 2015 at 5:22 pm // Reply

    Do we get to see the full video then

    • Pelt Williams // 10th Oct 2015 at 1:29 am // Reply

      +ItsAlwaysGod oClock Talk it up mouthpiece, you’ve never done anything to
      help anyone, you’re just an obsequious toad.

    • Steve Blakey // 10th Oct 2015 at 1:35 am // Reply

      How come you are yet to show us this footage of this unkown object??? i
      would of thought that would be a little more important than showing us
      anything else? i do love yor work but you have really let me down on this
      coverage? you havent lost that little sd card have you??? lol

    • Bill Seward // 10th Oct 2015 at 10:05 pm // Reply

      +d5uncr please explain what caused all past cataclysms

    • Lavender Dorie // 14th Oct 2015 at 6:48 am // Reply

      +Bill Seward Here is an explanation, to believe or not at your own
      discretion. I continue to be undecided as yet.

    • +Lavender Dorie
      LOL! If it ain’t imaginary “Planet Xs” it’s bogus “flat earths”.
      Some people just have this *compulsive* need to believe in completely crazy
      things, don’t they…?
      Well, at least the “flat earthers” don’t think their fantasy will kill them
      or believe they should drink phenobarbital, apple sauce and vodka to be
      able to get on some “UFO”…

  12. Mark Offski // 4th Oct 2015 at 8:13 pm // Reply

    Great experiment, and in the UK too, cant wait to see your findings, Well
    done Dave and all involved!

    • +Mark Offski thankyou, nice to get some thanks after all the work I have
      put in to organise these launches and produce the videos, it is very time
      consuming to say the least.

    • Mark Offski // 7th Oct 2015 at 10:36 am // Reply

      +dgwilym No worries Dave, we in the UK are just as keen to find out the
      truth as our American cousins, i was hoping to get to the Llyn peninsula
      this summer for some clear sky filming but work pressures kept me away.
      Appreciate all the effort you guys put in.

  13. it was probably the moon

  14. Brad Barron // 12th Jan 2016 at 12:12 am // Reply

    When is the next launch?! I can not wait to see how these objects up there
    have moved.

  15. Joan Evans // 15th Jan 2016 at 2:13 am // Reply

    “Planet X on 2nd. Balloon Launch?” – Absolutely not. Anything you think you
    can “‘see” from the camera, (what kind of camera is it btw?), on your
    balloon flying at less then 37,000ft is definitely not “Planet X”? The
    world wide astronomy community, (who I assume you assume lie about
    everything), would be on the front page of every newspaper, and the lead on
    every tv news report if “Planet X” was close enough to be seen like that.

  16. 1906Farnsworth // 25th Feb 2016 at 7:56 am // Reply

    Are you seriously wondering if the cloud next to the Sun might be a newly
    discovered planet? Did I miss something? It seems to be implied by the
    title of the video.

  17. ActivistsHub // 6th Apr 2016 at 9:45 pm // Reply

    its a jet contrail you moron

  18. Perhaps you need to watch a solar eclipse.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Share This