Latest News

The Earth is Not Moving

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

The heliocentric theory, literally “flying” in the face of direct observation, experimental evidence and common sense, maintains that the ball-Earth is spinning around its axis at 1,000 miles per hour, revolving around the Sun at 67,000 miles per hour, while the entire solar system rotates around the Milky Way galaxy at 500,000 miles per hour, and the Milky Way speeds through the expanding Universe at over 670,000,000 miles per hour, yet no one in history has ever felt a thing! We can feel the slightest breeze on a summer’s day, but never one iota of air displacement from these incredible speeds! Heliocentrists claim with a straight face that their ball-Earth spins at a constant velocity dragging the atmosphere in such a manner as to perfectly cancel all centrifugal, gravitational, and inertial forces so we do not feel the tiniest bit of motion, perturbation, wind or air resistance! Such back-peddling, damage-control reverse-engineered explanations certainly stretch the limits of credibility and the imagination, leaving much to be desired by discerning minds. If the Earth and atmosphere are constantly revolving Eastwards at 1,000 mph, how is it that clouds, wind, and weather patterns casually and unpredictably go every which way, often travelling in opposing directions simultaneously? Why can we feel the slightest Westward breeze but not the Earth’s incredible supposed 1,000 mph Eastward spin!? And how is it that the magic velcro of gravity is strong enough to drag miles of Earth’s atmosphere along, but weak enough to allow little bugs, birds, clouds and planes to travel freely unabated in any direction?

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy Paperback:

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy PDF:

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy EPub:

41 Comments on The Earth is Not Moving

  1. Lee Hayward // 21st Jan 2015 at 7:07 am // Reply

    Eric, do you know of any Universe Sandbox simulations demonstrating the
    flat earth ? It would be interesting to see if anybody has used that tool
    to visually illustrate this theory in a format that anyone can download and
    scrutinise. If it works in the simulation it will be pretty near impossible
    to disprove. 

  2. Michael Mays // 26th Jan 2015 at 6:09 pm // Reply

    All this math would be really neat if not for this pesky thing called

    The assumption that anything on or near a massive celestial body (you know,
    like a planet, for instance) will move *in space* at a trajectory and speed
    completely independent of the angular gravity of that celestial body is
    just incompetent. What you have is a lot of really impressive math that
    completely fails to take into account angular momentum, which is a
    near-constant… so Baumgartner (who was still well within the testable,
    observable gravity well of Earth) only ended up being 70km off after having
    fallen 39km. Frankly, I’m surprised he drifted that far. Likely had more to
    do with wind.

    So when you leave one of the most basic and consequential variables out of
    the equation, *it is absurd to conclude that you have a right answer.* You
    cannot arbitrarily fix a reference point outside the earth for objects…
    on the earth. Gravity has consequences. These flat-earth computations can
    only work by completely ignoring it.

  3. James Fraser // 6th Feb 2015 at 6:58 pm // Reply

    Foucault’s Pendulum anyone?

    • Eric Dubay // 7th Feb 2015 at 8:07 am // Reply

      In the mid 19th century a Frenchman named Léon Foucault became famous for
      swinging pendulums and claiming their consequent motions were proof of the
      Earth’s diurnal rotation. Since then “Foucault Pendulums” have regularly
      been swinging at museums and exposition halls worldwide purporting to
      provide everlasting perpetual proof of the heliocentric spinning ball-Earth
      theory. The truth is, however, unbeknownst to most of the duped public,
      that Foucault’s pendulum is a failed experiment which proves nothing but
      how easy it is for pseudo-science to deceive the malleable masses.

      “This pendulum, modern scientists tell us, affords a visible proof that we
      are living on a whirling globe, which, according to a ‘work on science’ now
      before me, is spinning upon its so-called axis at the rate of over 1,000
      miles an hour at the equator; and, in addition to other motions, is rushing
      on an everlasting tour round the sun (the diameter of which is said to be
      813,000 miles, and its weight 354,936 times greater than the earth from
      which it is said to be about 93,000,000 miles distant,) at the rate of over
      1,000 miles per minute. Now to prove that the earth really has these
      motions a pendulum is suspended at the show; the showman sets motion, and
      bids the gaping world of thoughtless men and women to ‘behold a proof’ that
      we are living on a whirling globe which is rushing away through space!”
      -Lady Blount, “The Romance of Science” (7)

      “Astronomers have made experiments with pendulums which have been suspended
      from the interior of high buildings, and have exulted over the idea of
      being able to prove the rotation of the Earth on its ‘axis,’ by the varying
      direction taken by the pendulum over a prepared table underneath –
      asserting that the table moved round under the pendulum, instead of the
      pendulum shifting and oscillating in different directions over the table!
      But, since it has been found that, as often as not, the pendulum went round
      the wrong way for the ‘rotation’ theory, chagrin has taken the place of
      exultation, and we have a proof of the failure of astronomers in their
      efforts to substantiate their theory.” -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the
      Earth is Not a Globe” (73)

      To begin with, Foucault’s pendulums do not uniformly swing in any one
      direction. Sometimes they rotate clockwise and sometimes
      counter-clockwise, sometimes they fail to rotate and sometimes they rotate
      far too much. Scientists who have repeated variations of the experiment
      have conceded time and again that “it was difficult to avoid giving the
      pendulum some slight lateral bias at starting.” The behavior of the
      pendulum actually depends on 1) the initial force beginning its swing and,
      2) the ball-and-socket joint used which most-readily facilitates circular
      motion over any other. The supposed rotation of the Earth is completely
      inconsequential and irrelevant to the pendulum’s swing. If the alleged
      constant rotation of the Earth affected pendulums in any way, then there
      should be no need to manually start pendulums in motion! If the Earth’s
      diurnal rotation caused the 360 degree uniform diurnal rotation of
      pendulums, then there should not exist a stationary pendulum anywhere on

      “First, when a pendulum, constructed according to the plan of M. Foucault,
      is allowed to vibrate, its plane of vibration is often variable – not
      always. The variation when it does occur, is not uniform – is not always
      the same in the same place; nor always the same either in its rate or
      velocity, or in its direction. It cannot therefore be taken as evidence;
      for that which is inconstant cannot be used in favor of or against any
      given proposition. It therefore is not evidence and proves nothing!
      Secondly, if the plane of vibration is observed to change, where is the
      connection between such change and the supposed motion of the Earth? What
      principle of reasoning guides the experimenter to the conclusion that it is
      the Earth which moves underneath the pendulum, and not the pendulum which
      moves over the Earth? What logical right or necessity forces one
      conclusion in preference to the other? Thirdly, why was not the peculiar
      arrangement of the point of suspension of the pendulum specially
      considered, in regard to its possible influence upon the plane of
      oscillation? Was it not known, or was it overlooked, or was it, in the
      climax of theoretical revelry, ignored that a ‘ball-and-socket’ joint is
      one which facilitates circular motion more readily than any other?” -Dr.
      Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (153)

      “We believe, with all due deference to the pendulum, and its proprietor,
      that it proves nothing but the craftiness of the inventor; and we can only
      describe the show and showman as deceptions. A thing so childish as this
      ‘pendulum proof’ that it can only be described as one of the most simple
      and ridiculous attempts to gull the public that has ever been conceived. It
      has been said that the pendulum experiment proves the rotation of the
      earth, but this is quite impossible, for one pendulum turns one way; and
      sometimes, another pendulum turns in the opposite direction. Now we ask
      does the earth rotate in opposite directions at different places at one and
      the same time? We should like to know. Perhaps the experimenters will
      kindly enlighten us on this point … If the earth had the terrible motions
      attributed to it, there would be some sensible effects of such motions.
      But we neither feel the motion, see it, nor hear it. And how people can
      stand watching the pendulum vibrate, and think that they are seeing a proof
      of the motions of the earth, almost passes comprehension. They are,
      however, brought up to believe it, and it is thought to be ‘scientific’ to
      believe what the astronomers teach.” -Lady Blount, “The Romance of
      Science” (8-10)

    • +Eric Dubay “To begin with, Foucault’s pendulums do not uniformly swing in
      any one direction. Sometimes they rotate clockwise and sometimes
      counter-clockwise, sometimes they fail to rotate and sometimes they rotate
      far too much.”

      No, it doesn’t. It rotates in one direction and at a certain speed. Try it
      for yourself.

    • Traolach O'Breasaill // 10th May 2016 at 10:02 am // Reply

      +James Fraser Michelson-Morley experiment

  4. justsomeotherstuff // 21st Sep 2015 at 10:09 pm // Reply

    this is the stupidest thing i have ever seen

  5. TheComputec // 23rd Jan 2016 at 12:15 am // Reply

    The reason you cannot feel or sense the earth spinning is because
    EVERYTHING is spinning in the same direction…. When you are on a train
    that is travelling at 100mph, the only way you can sense you are moving
    that fast is when it first accelerates OR i when it brakes…. Consider a
    wasp or a bee which happens to be inside the carriage…. Is that bee
    flying at 100 mph or simply hovering? This video is a well made clip… But
    it is absolute bullshit…. It is the gravity created by the orbits of
    these planets and systems that keeps them all in relative space …. If the
    moon isn’t spinning around the earth for example then what controls the
    tides? And consequently if you at least accept that the moon is spinning in
    orbit around the earth, please explain how we have eclipses which can
    Sometimes be solar eclipses and at other times be lunar eclipses… How
    could this happen if there were no rotation? See now ?? I don’t know what
    the makers of this video are smoking.. They are wrong

    • Trevor Willis // 5th Jul 2016 at 4:47 pm // Reply

      Stupid brains… Stand towards the end of a moving train and jump as high
      as you can… Will you land exactly where you jumped from?! Now do the same
      on the ground… Do you get the same results…. Durrrrr dahhhh duhyeeeeee

    • plentyofouts // 5th Jul 2016 at 7:23 pm // Reply

      +Trevor Willis Its quite amazing to think that we have never and will never
      truly stand in the same place twice. Like being on a train that has
      infinite track and never stops. Even though the earth orbits. It’s never in
      exactly the same spot in space.

    • TheComputec // 5th Jul 2016 at 9:05 pm // Reply

      +Bamfingbadab If the moon is a SOURCE of light instead of a reflector of
      sunlight, please explain why it goes dark when the Earth moves between the
      moon and the sun… it’s called an eclipse… you’ve heard of eclipses

    • TheComputec // 5th Jul 2016 at 9:07 pm // Reply

      +Its MyMoJo River flow directions are to do with the height of the source
      relative to the basin or other body of water they flow into… Water
      doesn’t flow upwards whichever way the earth is spinning

  6. Jaki Rose // 4th May 2016 at 8:39 pm // Reply

    PLEASE go take an intro physics class.

    • jabbacoola1 // 16th Jul 2016 at 5:25 am // Reply

      +Jaki Rose Because of mountains smarty pants

    • jabbacoola1 // 16th Jul 2016 at 5:31 am // Reply

      +jabbacoola1 look one thing I know for sure is that the earth is not moving
      and if that is true then you really have to consider the description that
      the Bible gave of the earth

  7. Breaky Jose // 7th May 2016 at 6:20 am // Reply

    The Earth is not being spun nearly as fast as this bullshit

  8. Evidencias de Dios // 26th May 2016 at 3:51 am // Reply

    There is proofs of geocentrism but this isnt one of them. The autor of the
    video dont understand the laws of relative movement.

    • Evidencias de Dios // 9th Jul 2016 at 2:40 am // Reply

      +hunchbacked Michelson-Morley, Airy and Sagnac experiments are proofs of
      geocentrism, and proofs of moving earth like Coriolis and geostationary
      sattelites have explanation from geocentrism trough Mach´s principle.

  9. Eric Dubious … need at least a weeks study of Newtonian
    Physics…but then again scientific truth is of no concern to you right?

  10. Mutantcy1992 // 1st Jun 2016 at 11:43 pm // Reply

    Get in an elevator on the 100th floor of a building and take it down to the
    ground level. The elevator starts at rest, then accelerates to a certain
    velocity that it maintains for the majority of the ride before decelerating
    in order to come to a stop at the ground level. Why is it that if you jump
    right as the elevator starts accelerating, that you will go higher than a
    normal jump, but if you jump while you’re at constant velocity passing
    through the 50th floor that the jump takes you no higher or lower than the
    same jump would on unmoving ground?

    Everything inside the elevator—the air, you, other people—will be moving at
    the same velocity once the elevator stops accelerating. In your frame of
    reference, nothing in the elevator is moving at all. We don’t feel constant
    velocity as motion; we only feel acceleration as motion. That’s why driving
    at 70 mph on smooth, flat roads doesn’t feel like you’re moving much or at
    all, but slamming on the brakes suddenly makes you feel motion. It’s the
    same with the Earth. The Earth’s movement is constant, and the atmosphere
    is moving at the same rate as the ground (barring wind for simplicity).
    That’s why we don’t feel the motion of the Earth’s rotation or orbit.

    • Jordan Gons // 9th Jun 2016 at 10:07 pm // Reply

      Yeah, by their logic it’s a good thing we’re required to wear seatbelts
      because we’d all be flung to the back of a car every time we drive quickly.

    • Bad People and Friends // 23rd Jun 2016 at 7:13 pm // Reply

      But they’ll throw this perfectly reasoned and logical piece of factual
      information in the bin so it fits their arguments.

  11. I want my 8 minutes back.

  12. emanueledes7 // 28th Jun 2016 at 12:01 am // Reply

    This is like the idiot of the village saying: “The earth doesn’t move!!! I
    have been waiting the entire night on this chair here at the corner of the
    street, BUT my house didn’t come to me!!!”.

  13. Bokke Pruiker // 2nd Jul 2016 at 4:32 pm // Reply

    come on Globers, 99% of you think the earth is round because you saw a
    picture of it, a freaking picture not even a real photograph

  14. plentyofouts // 5th Jul 2016 at 7:26 pm // Reply

    ‘Always keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out’

  15. SemperFiLeo // 13th Jul 2016 at 8:50 pm // Reply

    where is the link to the original full video?

  16. Ali Jamali // 15th Jul 2016 at 7:41 pm // Reply

    Someone livivng at 0° latitude has a bigger distance to travel per 24hours
    than someone living near the pole, so his speed will be higher, ok ? The
    speed Earth is rejecting the one at 0° latitude with is equal to earth
    gravity, that’s why he is in a balance on the surface, not rejected to
    outside and not absorbed by earth. This speed which is a counterbalancefor
    gravity is lower near the pole. So why aren’t people there absorbed by the
    surface or at least feeling themselves heavier than in the equator ??? any
    suggestion ? Because if not, earth might not be spinning at all and all
    schools thru the world may be teaching a 200 years new aged invented
    science !!! No way ? have we really been tricked that way ?

  17. So if the earth is spinning at approx. 1000mph at the equator, then I
    assume at 45 degrees North it’s spinning 500mph, and 0mph at the North
    pole? Then how can a plane take off from northern Alaska and fly South to
    the equator without the pilot having to worry about the Earth spinning at
    an alarming rate underneath him? You can’t say the atmosphere is ‘pushing’
    the plane along in an easterly direction, because that would be encountered
    as an increasingly strong wind, and would throw out navigation principles
    (that compensate for forecasted wind) completely.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Share This