Latest News

Welcome The Southern Stars To The Flat Earth

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

This is an all new discover so it needs a whole lot more research study and also eyes but ultimately a verifiable method of revealing and also conveniently discussing the southerly stars on the level earth. Obtain a dome magnifier as well as a laser pointer and you'll see … there is a number to find here. Many thanks for watching:
3" Dome Magnifier:
4: Dome Magnifier:
1 Laser Guideline:

Various other Channels Included in Video
CHL:
VoysovReason:
Interested J:

✔ Other Channels
GLOBEBUSTERS SUN 12PM PT
JERANISMRAW: MON 6PM-9PM PT Full Shows and also archives available at TFR:

✉ EMAIL ME: jeranism@yahoo.com
✉ E-MAIL BOB: bob@jeranism.com
– WEBSITE/FAQ's/ VIDS/LINKS/ASK:
– FACEBOOK:
– TWITTER:

▪ If you appreciate our job, please support us to ensure that we can proceed doing just what we love. My video clips will always be totally free. The support option is for those that see worth in just what we are doing as well as the video clips we make. ▪.
" Patreon:.
" PayPal:.

▪ or please bookmark or duplicate our amazon link listed below … utilize it prior to you shop as well as we make a tiny portion.
" AMAZON:.

A massive thank you to those of you who have already registered as customers or that have actually utilized the Amazon.com link. You have actually helped us a lot as well as we are really thankful.

✔ PLEASE NOTE.
My videos are my personal viewpoint as well as just that. If you hear the words truth or reality, I am stating my point of view. You could have a different opinion. If you don't like hearing my viewpoint on the issue, merely block me. If you make a comment and it does not appear, you have actually possibly struck a filter that I have readied to remove remarks that are pointless. Any personal assault, name calling, attract authority, straw males disagreements or excess profanity tied nonsense will be removed as well. Likewise if you have no avatar, you'll possibly be removed. Drop a web link, please discuss what it is or I will remove it. I don't have time to go through remark by remark so if your own is inadvertently deleted, attempt once more.

For those that believe themselves so smart and also well enlightened … you need to comprehend that I am saying that several of exactly what you have been educated is not proper and also as such, you telling all of us how smart and also ideal you are is simply confirming my factor. I am testing "clinical truth," due to the fact that doing so will either disclose that I was shown the truth or I can aid rid the world of the lies as well as with each other, we all get closer to the truth. Asking concerns is step 1 of the clinical method. Blind belief in what you are informed signifies a religious beliefs. Go enjoy a video you enjoy … life is as well brief.

☻ As constantly, thanks for viewing!

✌ Tranquility! ✌.

78 Comments on Welcome The Southern Stars To The Flat Earth

  1. a well placed grenade // 2nd Jul 2017 at 1:51 pm // Reply

    Happy Sunday Jeran. Hope you have a great day man.

    • Yellowsnowisbad 13 // 2nd Jul 2017 at 2:30 pm // Reply

      jeranism yeah, you must be exhausted from spewing this much bs.

    • uhatefree speech // 2nd Jul 2017 at 6:14 pm // Reply

      @yellowjournalism, why you get so butt hurt about what we believe ? we dont follow you to the NAMBLA site you frequent and mock you

    • a well placed grenade // 2nd Jul 2017 at 6:16 pm // Reply

      uhatefree speech don’t know if you produce content or not but just for your comment, and your moniker, you got a sub.

    • Yellowsnowisbad 13 // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:08 pm // Reply

      uhatefree speech , anyway, this is bs.

  2. Kodak Courage // 2nd Jul 2017 at 1:51 pm // Reply

    Wolfie will never understand.

    • isimanica1 // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:30 pm // Reply

      Spake Face really is funny how you people can’t get any model to work. Always revising it seems every couple of weeks. Yeah your foolish flat headed knuckle dragging belief is just going to implode and you fools will disavow it all in the end.

    • Indigo Raven // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:36 pm // Reply

      6,000 years. You mean when Polaris is still the northern pole star? Also can you link to your testing with a magnification dome and a laser for comparative purposes? Thanks!

    • Flat Earth 2017 Consciousness // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:41 pm // Reply

      To Date: STILL ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF OF ANY CURVE, CURVED WATER OR MOTION ON EARTH. Your Globe belief is a Religion…period…

    • Ozzy games // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:53 pm // Reply

      Flat Earth 2017 Consciousness

      horizon
      tornado spins
      ocean currents
      wind pattern
      pithagorean measurements
      flights from the japan to the us
      the fact that maths prove it
      gravity

      just to list some

  3. Aaron Zambrano // 2nd Jul 2017 at 1:57 pm // Reply

    also, look at time and date and the day/night map. it’s never night time at the same time in all 3 of those places. so the night time view someone in Australia sees, would simply rotate towards Africa, then South America along with the night

    • Flat Earth 2017 Consciousness // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:39 pm // Reply

      We are not on a Globe..Period

    • Flat Earth Math // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:50 pm // Reply

      +Quantum Eraser, sorry to break it to you, but the Earth is not a spinning ball. But I do give you a thumbs-up for the shortest comment you’ve ever posted in the history of YouTube. 🙂

    • Quantum Eraser // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:27 pm // Reply

      Flat Earth Math

      “sorry to break it to you, but the Earth is not a spinning ball.”—

      It’s about time.

      “But I do give you a thumbs-up for the shortest comment you’ve ever posted in the history of YouTube. :-)”—

      Well I shortened it because I knew you wouldn’t be able to comprehend then assimilate more than three short sentences into one coherent thought.

      Consider it, ‘Be Kind to Dumb Animal Week’. 😉

      regards

  4. Jeren you are geometrically illiterate. You don’t understand what a cone is as proved by your failed globe experiment.

    • The moon does not have a “cooling effect” that’s one of the many FE myths, so how can I show proof of something that doesn’t actually exist?

      I hate to break it to you but you are not more clever than scientists, all of which (thousands and thousands) do not think the Earth is flat!

    • joseph meredith // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:34 pm // Reply

      emsky333 Where I’m at in California, you can go outside, look up and see the sun and the moon at the same time. There is NOTHING in between them. Why does the moon have a shadow on it? Why is it not full if the sun lights the moon?

    • Flat Earth 2017 Consciousness actually i was open to flat earth, then i did more research and changed my mind… so who are the real fanatics?

    • Yes I believe you can, there have been many occasions when I myself see the moon in the sky during the day, this is because of the proximity of the moon and the Earth. The shadow I will take to mean the phases which are caused by the illumination of the sun, the sun always lights half of the moon, however from our viewpoint on Earth we only see part of it, they would appear as what we call phases.

      A new moon is when the moon is between the Earth and sun, so that the side of the moon facing towards us receives no direct sunlight, as it moves around the Earth, the side we can see gradually becomes more illuminated by direct sunlight and creates phases. A new moon, would mean a full moon for the opposite side of the Earth

    • Yellowsnowisbad 13 // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:21 pm // Reply

      joseph meredith do you know the difference between a circle and a sphere?

  5. Deatheraux // 2nd Jul 2017 at 2:07 pm // Reply

    They’re not the same stars though? You can only see alpha centauri when you go towards the southern hemisphere. Also the southern cross, also only visible from the southern hemisphere.

    • Spake Face // 2nd Jul 2017 at 5:10 pm // Reply

      Deatheraux ahhh, but clocks are dependant on the perceived time zones at a time when there was no globe model yet. So how did they accurately syncronise without real-time communications and high speed internet?

    • Deatheraux // 2nd Jul 2017 at 5:12 pm // Reply

      Spake Face I’ve demonstrated why this line of questioning is pointless and you’re still asking questions?

    • Spake Face // 2nd Jul 2017 at 5:16 pm // Reply

      Deatheraux yes, school classes are where you go for your scientism baptisms. So you can learn to repeat false doctrines. And when your released from your pen, you get to keep on repeating the same tired old bibles of scientism.

    • Spake Face // 2nd Jul 2017 at 5:18 pm // Reply

      Deatheraux nah, you’ve only demonstrated how indoctrinated you are.

    • Spake Face // 2nd Jul 2017 at 5:21 pm // Reply

      Deatheraux forget my questions. I don’t want or need anything from you. You’ve proven your worth.

  6. Flat Enough // 2nd Jul 2017 at 2:11 pm // Reply

    No Straight Lines on Globe Earth

  7. 5:20 If you want to go straight to the Southern Stars. There is one plane of stars. They all rotate around Polaris. As you get towards the sides of the earth, the stars above you reverse direction exactly as the glass half dome shows it. So, someone in Australia looks south and sees reversed stars as does the person in South Africa. But they would be further rotated through. Lastly, the second rotation does not have a middle star. Which fits the model perfect, there is no southern star because no such thing exists.

    • on the level // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:58 pm // Reply

      Fernando Rodriguez I can hear the sound of ball earthers collectively spitting out there dummy’s

    • Fernando Rodriguez // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:18 pm // Reply

      on the level instead of a “not funny” post, why not not show some evidence or physical explanation of anything!!!! Whatever will do you guys just insult or try to make fun and never explain anything.

    • Justin Gilead // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:28 pm // Reply

      *I can hear the sound of ball earthers collectively spitting out there dummy’s*

      Half of the south is in night at any given time, right?
      Well then explain how everyone on that 180 deg (half-pizza) of a flat earth can all look South (by their compasses), which is “out” on the flat earth, and see those southern stars rotating around that point?

    • ming the merciless // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:42 pm // Reply

      Justin Gilead that’s the part that was conveniently glossed over . the flattards don’t seem to realise that is the crucial part which disproves their model ! it has really been put to them in the most basic terms but they just don’t get it at all !!

    • Kip Jacobs // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:50 pm // Reply

      Jeran, get onto Steemit brother man, monetize your stuff and it’s the next gen for social media!

  8. you can’t stop us indeed! peace!

  9. Wisdom Afoolweakness // 2nd Jul 2017 at 2:17 pm // Reply

    Wolfie full of crap if you ask me

  10. Awesome work. Nice subliminal plug for Nuts.com.

  11. Lee Harvey Hitler // 2nd Jul 2017 at 2:20 pm // Reply

    This should bring out all of the Balltards and their cognitive dissonance!!!!

    • Lee Harvey Hitler // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:50 pm // Reply

      emsky333 sounds like a little projection yourself. I think it is hilarious when indoctrinated fools such as yourself can’t cope with the fact that heliocentrism is a religion based on dogmatic BELIEFS and pseudoscience…..The debate has been over. You do not live on a ball..it’s ok!

    • The debate was over around one hundred years ago when the Bedford level experiment disproved a FE and the global Earth was then included in the curriculum ha ha

    • Nope it wasn’t, it was very conclusive of a curvature, in regards to rotation… ignoring time, the sun, moon and stars moving across the sky and that it can be seen rotating from space, there is the foucault pendulum. Rotation is based on evidence and experimentation as is all science, ignoring the science facts and replacing it with illogical statements only highlights that it’s not me who’s the ignorant fanatic.

      Show me your proof the Earth is flat, of how far the Earth stretches, show me proof of where it ends, show me proof of the ice wall that surrounds us, show me proof of a glass dome, show me proof the moon is self-illuminating, show me proof there is water outside of this dome, show me proof the sun and moon is inside this dome.

      All you have is a hypothesis of how it is rather than any actual evidence to back up your wild and ridiculous claims, and is why FE will be categorised along with “the moon is made of cheese”, it will never be taken seriously scientifically.

      Look up the definition of religion, science is based on fact finding, experimentation and asking questions, religion is based on faith, trusting in a something that cannot be proven… Spherical Earth = Science, Flat Earth = Faith and belief.

  12. Good video bro I just wanted to point out that when they show a person standing in Australia ,South America, and Africa looking at the stars at the exact same time they’re forgetting that in some of those spots it will be daylight out in one place so all three are not going to see the stars at once

    • almarjyou // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:30 pm // Reply

      mike i am talking about your map. yes they are night time. i’ll bet in it. even on the globe. because that flat earth map is a distorted map.

    • +mike because you’re assuming that that makes it work, you’re assuming that this means the stars traverse across the night sky left to right to travel to the other country’s.

    • almarjyou // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:31 pm // Reply

      mike get the flat earth map, and cut a half line. you would see that it is night time. wanna bet?

    • almarjyou According to both maps the flat earth map and the globe earth map

  13. Ok just Two question ?
    How come nobody can get to the end of the Flat Earth . What’s stopping us from getting there .

  14. StarDustSid // 2nd Jul 2017 at 3:05 pm // Reply

    Jeranism explains how two observers, facing south on opposite edges of a flat earth can see the same stars. Except he doesn’t.

    • Noniksleft // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:17 pm // Reply

      *East Brazil and part of Western Australia are fully dark at the same time in their winter.* Even so, it’s not fucking hard to calculate that if Africa and Australia see the same stars at the same time, then a few hours later Africa and South America see the same stars at the same time that they would all effectively see them at the same time.

    • Alexander Kessler // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:45 pm // Reply

      scott merrow on 2 of the 3 continents it can.

    • not to mention, you don’t need to SEE the stars to detect that they are there.

  15. Great comedy , best on YT , keep the vids coming . Just think there are folks who believe you , yikes

    • Josh West // 2nd Jul 2017 at 3:40 pm // Reply

      funsweed Why are you here? Hmm

    • Just to see how many folks take this comedy as being serious

    • Josh West // 2nd Jul 2017 at 4:59 pm // Reply

      funsweed Why is it that important to you if you truly think this is all bullshit? Do you not have anything better to do than criticize others for seeking their own answers? I hope this is a front and you use ridicule to mask your inability to deduce the tough questions that you and your “scientist” don’t have the answers to.

  16. Flat Earth Math // 2nd Jul 2017 at 3:21 pm // Reply

    Hello +Jeranism. Dome magnifiers are fascinating, but there’s a key point that you left out of your presentation: *distortion.* When folks take either star trail photos, or better yet, still-frame exposures of the Southern stars, there is zero distortion. The geometry of the constellations does not change, as it must around the periphery of a dome magnifier.

    Here’s a challenge for anyone: take a star pattern (or just a random series of dots) and rotate them under an off-center dome magnifier, and watch what the stars do around the periphery of the magnifier. You will not see them travel in a perfect circle, nor will they even travel with the same speed on each star’s journey, both requirements to match the southern celestial pole stars. 🙂

    The second point you made is about there being “no” southern pole star, or “no star at the center.” This is not true, there are many stars very very close to the South Celestial Pole (SCP), they’re just not naked-eye stars like Polaris. But the SCP is a very specific point in the Southern sky, not a random point with no star at the center.

    It is a very difficult challenge for the FE model to account for how three people in South Africa, Eastern Brazil, and Western Australia (see link to map below) can all look southward at the same time and see the same point in *their* southern sky, with NO distortion. They can all see the Southern Cross, they can all see Alpha and Beta Centauri, and if they have inky black skies, they can see the Large and Small Magellenic Clouds. These objects all surround and point to the SCP, even if there are no naked-eye stars there.
    timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html?iso=20170620T2144

    This geometry is a huge puzzle for Flat Earth folks, and yes, many people have called this “impossible.” Conversely, the “puzzle” of the South Celestial Pole and circumpolar stars disappears under the Heliocentric model. No puzzle, no dilemma, just a situation as straightforward as the North polar stars and constellations, with no distortion. Under the globe Earth model, there’s *perfect* north-south symmetry. You can literally turn the globe South-Pole-up and everything works exactly the same, and all observations continue to correlate with the real world. Cheers! 🙂

    • Quantum Eraser // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:03 pm // Reply

      +Saul Trane

      “the earth is round”—

      Really??

      “The salar de Uyuni in the Bolivian Andes is the largest salt flat on Earth, exhibiting *LESS THAN 1 M OF VERTICAL RELIEF* over an area of 9000 km2″ …”Longer wavelengths in the DEM [Digital Elevation Model] correlate well with mapped gravity, suggesting a connection between broad-scale salar topography and the geoid similar to that seen over the oceans.”
      Borsa A. A., et al: Topography of the salar de Uyuni, Bolivia from kinematic GPS; Geophysical Journal International Volume 172, Issue 1, p. 31-40
      http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/content/172/1/31.full

      This is a Geometrical Flat Plane.

      You can have a myriad of Topographical Features on a Sphere: Mountains, Ridges, Saddles, Spurs, Depressions, ect ect; Ya know what you *CAN’T HAVE (??) …*

      *”A Geometrical Flat Plane”*

      And this one is over *”9000 km2″!!!!*

      Please reconcile on a Sphere…?

      *Sea Sparrow (NATO):*

      “Bistatic, semiactive seekers in the nose of a missile receive a reflected signal from a target that is being “illuminated” with an RF signal transmitted from a fire control radar on a stand-off platform (e.g., aircraft, ship). Such systems *REQUIRE* that the platform maintain *LINE OF SIGHT (LOS)* to the target until it is engaged by the missile. Ship-based standard missile (SM) and NATO Seasparrow AAW missiles are examples of such a semiactive mode.”
      http://m.eet.com/media/1111959/819_radar3.pdf

      Range is *MORE THAN 35 Miles* ( http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/evolved-sea-sparrow-missile-essm/ ). The target is “Illuminated” with a 2 inch Pencil Beam (RF) which has to be maintained *”Painted”* on the target until detonation. At a more than generous 80 Feet Elevation above Sea LEVEL, the target should be hidden behind 385 Feet of Curvature.

      Please explain how you can have *Line of Site (LOS) 35 Miles Away* on a “Spinning-Ball” by showing how an RF Pencil Beam can penetrate 385 Feet (117 METERS, lol) of Target Hidden Height through a WALL OF WATER *24 MILES in Length (lol, btw)*…??
      (ps. 35 miles is *”Low Balling”*: (The ‘Official’ Max Effective Range is Classified —- i.e. it’s MUCH MUCH greater than 35 Miles!).

      regards

    • Rune Thorsen // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:18 pm // Reply

      Saul Trane
      The Ball earth model states paralax ? the stars are not for ANY non sought intent an “infinate” distance away, but even if they where, it is the medium or media through witch we observe them here on Earth, that determines their apparent position and velosities. And about those media, we (ball earth model) know only 5% (regulairly observed matter and radiation in the sky), as the “dark matter/energi” is stated to be ~ approximately 92~ 95% procent of the total mass/energy of the observable universe, and we (ball model) have NO idea about what is going on between the stars and how this matter/energy affects vissability, we only have theories about lensing at these distances… Nothing went to the moon or beyond, so we literally guess about the rest..!?

    • Paul Taylor // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:23 pm // Reply

      Matt Holt
      concave earth is not realistic as all the oceans would pool in the middle.

    • Saul Trane // 2nd Jul 2017 at 10:55 pm // Reply

      +Quantum Eraser
      I don’t blame you for trying to change the subject from the stars to other things. You do need to ignore the sky if if you want to believe the earth is flat. I’m just giving you facts. If you ever decide to become a sailor and you find yourself in a position of needing to find your way by using the sun and stars, you will very quickly no longer care about your flat earth belief and you will revert to using the navigational methods that have be tried and tested over many centuries. You will operate under the assumption that the earth is a sphere, because that geometry is what will guide you to your destination. You must believe that’s just some kind of amazing coincidence?
      But once you’re back on land and can ignore the sky again, then you can go back to your flat earth prcatice.

  17. 4:40 : “There is no southern celestial pole”
    stop with your lying, yes there is, anyone that went south of the equator has seen it, and you are just making yourself look foolish (again).

  18. existenceisfake // 2nd Jul 2017 at 5:56 pm // Reply

    This is a silly explanation of southern stars. Looking up from within a dome is not the same as looking up through the bottom of a plano-convex lens. I mean really? It’s such a stretch. The refraction is extreme and would cause all kinds of distortion. If you were mimicking a dome over a flat earth you should be using a glass bowl, not a solid glass semi-spherical lens.
    This only illustrates how desperate flat earthers are to contrive an explanation for the southern stars, just one of many real-world observations that flat earth “theory” cannot account for.

    • FlatEarth Reality // 2nd Jul 2017 at 8:22 pm // Reply

      What part of flat earth hurts you do much +existenceisfake ??? The fact Teleology is a nailed on certainly or is it that God loves you regardless if your denial & philosophical bias.
      Tell yourself tge answer not me, I already know.

    • almarjyou // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:27 pm // Reply

      FlatEarth Reality you know he is right. it is not the same. he is looking from the top dome. a small one too. and that would be different stars going around. while it should all be the same constellations going around at a fixed point. what are you afraid of that we are in a globe?

  19. Flat Earth And Other Hot Potatoes // 2nd Jul 2017 at 9:06 pm // Reply

    “fun fun fun ’til your daddy takes the t-bird away”. Hahah. We’ve taken their ball away and they aren’t too happy. Shared.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


Shares
Share This